1200°
3.0

IGN Review : Ninja Gaiden 3 a Bloody Disaster

Wondering how Team Ninja fared without Tomonobu Itagaki at the helm? Well, read on for some seriously bad news.

Read Full Story >>
xbox360.ign.com
NewMonday4413d ago

the review reeks of nerd rage, hard on this and easy on ME3, is it the advertising?

will have to wait for more opinions

Abash4413d ago

The reviewer sounded really pissy, either he was a big fan of the series and is severely disappointed or he was having a bad week and took it out on the game. Either way the review screamed "Im reviewing this and Im angry!" which just made me really have the "O_o" face the whole time reading it

kaveti66164413d ago (Edited 4413d ago )

Well, IGN are run by human beings and obviously a big fan of the series decided to take off more points than technically necessary just to metaphorically flip the bird to the people involved in its production. I don't blame them because the game looks like it was made in 2008. Virtually no visual improvement, and an omission of what NG fans love: weapon variety and meaningful dismemberment.

"In another questionable step backward, Ryu sticks with just one weapon for the entire game."

That is the stupidest decision Team Ninja has made.

NukaCola4413d ago

The score is lower than the review led on, but at the same time this game looks outdated and I can understand everything he says and can feel his problems. I don't blame the review, he wasn't comparing it to other games, he wasn't bashing it recklessly or being an idiot about it, he was telling us that the game is flawed in designed, uneventful and over all of poor quality. I thought when the game came out, it would either be a real mind blower or a total let down. I was prepared for this.

I wonder why he didnt touch on the multiplayer though. Not up yet?

jetlian4413d ago (Edited 4413d ago )

actually there is footage with other weapons in the game

edit: http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Seems ign is going for hits even I who beat sigma 2 today know with all thats been changed the lowest this could get is a 7.

They claiming this worse than I am alive which I know is a lie. And I think I am alive is an 8

geddesmond4413d ago

Nah IGN are just looking for attention and I doubt Team Ninja payed them for a decent score so this is the result. I mean I bet the reviewer played the game on the easiest setting and then bitched about its ease.

Ah well IGN reviews can never be trusted, they'll give 9s and 10s to the games that get advertised on the site but not to games that don't

Markarie4413d ago

@NukaCola - Did you read the review? He definitely mentioned the multiplayer, saying it was plan bad.

I'm not sure why so many people are so quick to defend this game. You can go ahead and try to make up conspiracies about IGN giving better scores to games that advertise on their site, but the fact is that games with a bigger budget tend to be better and have more advertising. Of course there are exceptions, but that would be the trend. Ninja Gaiden 2 was all over IGN when it came out. Did you really think this game would be great without it's visionary at the helm? Ninja Gaiden 3 sucks. Get over it. This author just saved you $60.

gamingdroid4413d ago (Edited 4413d ago )

I cancelled my Collector's Edition at GameStop today and I'm like the biggest fan ever. I spent hundreds of hours on NG2 and own multiple copies of every game released.

This game from start to finish sounds like a disaster. The signs have been there all along:

- no dismemberment
- one weapon
- QTE
- enemies that beg for their life

... and now repetitive Dynasty Warrior like game play!?

I'm saddened that I have to drop Ninja Gaiden out of my top 3 game series. Thanks for destroying what I love Hayashi! :(

NukaCola4412d ago

@Markarie

I watched the video, but totally missed any multiplayer talk. I am not defending this game. It sounds like this game not only failed to address past issues, but it has created all new ones.

jony_dols4412d ago (Edited 4412d ago )

Kinda of reminds me of IGN's over-the-top moany & bitchy review of Silent Hill last week.

otherZinc4412d ago

@gamingdroid,

I agree with you 100%!

I called this disaster a long@ss time ago when they announced QTE'S!

This was my second favorite franchise of "All Times", now, this is killing me.

Thats ok. I'll play Ninja Gaiden, NG Black, & Ninja Gaiden 2 for my sanity!

Boody-Bandit4412d ago

Wow what a fall from grace.
I didn't like what I saw of this game, 1 weapon, QTE's, decreased violence, etc... but I didn't think it was going to be this bad. I still might give it a rent to see for myself.

jetlian4412d ago (Edited 4412d ago )

seems I lost a bubble in here lol and theres alot of new accounts made on this site

dont worry Im about to follow peeps and mark every comment you make!!

brutal I already proved there more than 1 weapon

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4412d ago
iamtehpwn4413d ago

I can imagine Itagaki reading this review while smoking and thinking "Told them they needed me more than I needed them"

Cupid_Viper_34413d ago

It sounds as if the game is broken and uninspiring. So i'm not too against the score applied to it. but my question is this, Why can't there be consistency in the review system, because there are games who have been using the same engines with little improvements over 2-3 games even. like COD and Street fighter and likes. those games are getting high marks when they barely improve on anything and just recycle

BitbyDeath4413d ago

Maybe Itagaki paid them previously for high scores? LOLZ

killerhog4412d ago

Wtf would itagaki of added? Even bigger breast? Better six-axis tit control? he wasn't doing anything innovative with either the doa or ninja gaiden franchises. Ign sweats the shit out of itagaki, probably why they were so harsh on this title. I bet if itagaki made ninja gaiden, and just added bigger boobs, better six-axis tit control, and nothing new as the past ninja gaiden games this gen, ign still give it a 8-10

WetN00dle694412d ago

@killerhog

Still an 8-10 would be better than a 3 if Itagaki was at the helm of things. I worry for the fate of my beloved Dead Or Alive! Team Ninja NEEDS Itagaki no if or buts about it!

irepbtown4412d ago (Edited 4412d ago )

With Itagaki at the Helm, the Ninja Gaiden's use to be absolute masterpieces.

When he is not, Ninja Gaiden turned into sheep poo.
They needed him, and now I bet he is laughing at them.

And IGN is inconsistent, giving games such as COD top marks yet it is repetitive and graphics haven't changed for 5 years (COD4 was the only magnificent game). Yet (just an example) Battlefield 3, which has showed great improvements from Battlefield 2 gets same as MW3 which had literally no changes.

Arnon4412d ago

Dismemberment? Better combos? More weapons? Better graphics? Bigger tits (yes, this is awesome)? He sorta did create the franchise, you know? Pretty sure I'd trust him over his obvious failure of a team.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4412d ago
OmegaSlayer4413d ago Show
OmegaSlayer4413d ago

An 8 from Official XBOX Magazine.
Seems a fair score.
http://www.oxm.co.uk/39359/...

kikizoo4413d ago

I don't know, since the game is not even out...but, xbox magazine has xbox games for standard, ign has all the others, it's probably the reason why you can see 3 and 8...

other reason ? one of the 2 reviewer didn't made a good job rewiewing this game.

OmegaSlayer4413d ago

Exactly, when scores gap more than 2-3 (out of 10) points, one of the reviewers is biased or unable to do his work.

GTANJ4412d ago

@OmegaSlayer - Right, because everybody knows that you must have the same opinion as others and if you don't then you are evil and should be banished for all eternity. Grow up.

ShinMaster4412d ago (Edited 4412d ago )

which have a stronger affiliation with this franchise.

So realistically speaking. It's a 5.5/10 if you average them out.

admiralvic4412d ago

@ Omega (the 2-3 gap reply):

You can't control who gets what. Being a fan vs being a non fan vs how many games you play vs how far you get vs how well you know the series vs skill.

Too many elements come into play which allow for different scores. In the end, it's not meant for every reviewer to agree, but for them all to offer their views on everything. While not everyone will be perfect, once you get an idea of how everything works, you should get a good understanding of the games value in your own perception.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4412d ago
callahan094412d ago (Edited 4412d ago )

So far, two 8's and a 7 are the other scores that have come out besides this IGN score. And one of the 8's and the 7 are from notoriously tough-scoring sources. Makes me question the validity of IGN's review, though it's not like the vitriolic and spiteful tone of the review wasn't already enough to make me question their intentions. Very unprofessional tone. If this were a restaurant review, you could only assume that the food was covered in hair and tasted of saliva and the waiter made you wait 2 hours and yelled at you when you asked for a refill. What could Team Ninja or this game have possibly done to the reviewer to warrant such outright flaming?

undisputed4412d ago

The game can't be *THAT* bad. Which is why I never take reviews as gospel. I'm on the fence with this one regardless.

killerhog4412d ago

Let me make it simple. Ign are itagaki fanboys they sweat the sh*t out of him.

undisputed4412d ago (Edited 4412d ago )

killerhog, I wanted to say that this guy is probably angry that Itagaki left, the game doesn't play how he remembers it under Itagaki and took it on this game but this is N4G so saying this would get fifteen disagrees.

DevilishSix4412d ago

Yeah but that OXM review reads like a 5/10 game but the reviewer coped out and gave it an 8. Reviewers are not doing gamers justice when they slam a game the entire review saying it is a shadow of its former self then give it an 8. How do we send developers a message that their game sucks if reviewers are afraid and gamers buy anything with a name?

Raider694412d ago

Well you must understand that the guy that review it is a Fan of the series.This is the way games should be reviewed,by someone that haves knowledge of previous games from the series.The 3/10 could be seen has harsh review by somepeople but for me a fan of NG from the NES times its totally deserved,i already tested the game and the game dont feel like a NG game.Yosuke Hayashi its a kid,to me he already had proven on the Sigma versions that he was a Ninja dog and not a follower to the Path of the mentor!Yosuke Hayashi ruin Ninja gaiden an most likely will ruin DOA too.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4412d ago
SonyPS3604412d ago

This is where you blame IGN until every other publication says the same thing and you suddenly go quiet about it.

So the cycle continues.

BrunoM4412d ago (Edited 4412d ago )

They will say it ..

But not 2 and 3 they will give it 7-8 even 6s but giving a game a 3 is to much I mean if they can give angry birds 7-8 lol give a game like NG a 3 is plain sad ..

I mean a 4.0 for graphics ?? Lol what did MW3 get ? Come on really ?

But what ever it's his view of the game .. To bad he forgets he has people who read it

Ryo-Hazuki4412d ago

I hope NG3 gets more 3s. They put in health regeneration, no upgradable weapons, 1 primary, no yellow essence, no treasure chests, and infested with QTE's. It's a slap in the face to the NG fans

DevilishSix4412d ago

Totally 100% agree. This is an action game not a Ninja Gaiden game. This game was made before, it was called Ninja Blade but at least that game had many more weapons.

oricon4412d ago

4.0 for the graphics? All i gotta say.

JANF4412d ago

This is a shame, for such a great franchise. Itagaki must be furious.

Patriots_Pride4412d ago

Somewhere in the world Itaki is ROFL.

honkyjesus4412d ago

I kind of went through the NG3 review, and a lot about it sounds like what should have been the Mass Effect 3 review. IGN has been giving any AAA game, especially franchise games, with marketing a 9 or 9.5 for quite a while.

If there is a big game coming out, seems like they have to love it.

STONEY44412d ago

There is absolutely nothing wrong with ME3 except for the ending, which is poorly done. It's a 9.5 game until the last 5 minutes. It vastly improved from ME2, and it's not a broken game.

This genuinely sounds like they took everything that made Ninja Gaiden... well, Ninja Gaiden, and just butchered it. 1 weapon? QTEs? No gore? Really?

FutureTechnologies4412d ago

Seems like he didn't got the fat check in time.

showtimefolks4412d ago

This is IGN don't trust them just laugh at them.

i am alive 4.5
silent hill 4.5
yakuza dead souls 5.0
and now ninja giaden 3.0

all those games have or are getting better scores every where, i don't know what's going on at ign they have not only been harsh but just idiotic

playboi284412d ago

Well, Silent Hill was pretty bad but I'm still not sure if it deserves less than a 5. IGN is ridiculous. I'd expect this from a reader score but not a professional critic.

admiralvic4412d ago

No idea on I am alive, though I've seen many low scores for it.
Silent Hill follows the standard storyline, so it's predictable and could use some small tweaks. While I don't think it's a 4.5, it's certainly not an amazing game either.
Dead Souls uses the left thumbstick to aim (from what I've read), which in it of it's self makes it awful (if true).
Demographics 101. Most NG fan will read it and casual people who know it's hard won't. It is directed towards hardcore fans, but the game lacks everything that makes it NG... so how does it deserve a high score?

Andreas-Sword4412d ago

IGN is not a serious gaming site!

STUFF gives Ninja Gaiden 3 a 5/5 (100%) score.
source: http://www.stuff.tv/review/...

And here are some another serious Ninja Gaiden 3 reviews:
CVG: 8/10 (80%)
http://www.computerandvideo...

OXM UK: 8/10 (80%)
http://www.oxm.co.uk/39359/...

OXM US: 8/10 (80%)
http://www.oxmonline.com/ni...

Metro: 8/10 (80%)
http://www.metro.co.uk/tech...

gamingdroid4412d ago

So what happened to the lower scoring reviews?

On metacritic, the overall score sits at 60 based on 7 reviews so it ain't all roses unless you selectively pick the reviews:

http://www.metacritic.com/g...

playboi284412d ago (Edited 4412d ago )

The lowest I saw on metacritic was a 50 other than IGN. That at least sounds believable. I'm not saying the game is good or deserves a high score. But you can't seriously tell me it's the worst game this year. Maybe biggest disappointment, but not worst game. So, of course the metacritic score is very low. One score of 3 can greatly impact the average.

playboi284412d ago

I agree. A 3? Really? So, this game is worse than Velvet Assassin, X-Blades, and Venetica? They all got better scores. Even Soldier of Fortune got a 6.1 and it was completely broken. I no longer trust IGN for reviews. They aren't fair. If they don't like something, they completely destroy it in their score. If you don't believe me, look at the score for El Shaddai. IGN gave it a 5 but everybody else gave it an 8 or above. Hell, download the demo if you haven't played it and tell me what you think it deserves... I thought it was awesome.

likedamaster4412d ago

For next game, I have 3 words...

Unreal Engine 4.

50Terabytespersec4412d ago

The game got lame after it did multi platform..
Nothing but hand me down graphics from old Xbox and nothing new or exciting..Can you say boring as well.

Give me God of War anytime..

MASTER_RAIDEN4412d ago

so sick of people like you. if a series you might like doesnt get a great score, it MUST be because the reviewer is a jerk with a hidden agenda. its just NOT POSSIBLE that a game you might like could ever suck. they must be purposely putting out negative press.

Im a fan of the series, yeah. but lemmie tell ya, it doesnt seem like anything the reviewer says is out of line. i havent played the game myself, but throughout the review i immediately noticed that the graphics werent exactly top notch, and the constant zooming in and out was nauseating as hell!
Be honest with yourselves people: some games just end up sucking. It's a reviewers job to bring you his/her opinion of the game, positive or negative.

wait wait...."cant spell ignorant without IGN!!"

4411d ago
+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 4411d ago
EmperorDalek4413d ago

...... My jaw has dropped. I am sad.

Drake1174413d ago

yeah this sucks. Im a huge NG fan idk wtf they were thinking with this one!!!!Damnit!!!

Laxman4413d ago

If you're a huge NG fan, try the game for yourself instead of conforming to the mass internet mob of change-hating armchair critics. Ive been a fan of the series since the NES, and think this game looks excellent. Ninja Gaiden was never about choice of weapons, its always been about the rewarding challenge and ultra-stylish violence. Which this game looks to have.

Drake1174413d ago

It sounds like the game has a whole lot more wrong with it than a lack of choice of weapons...The guy even said it was jokingly easy and felt nothing like previous NG games.

rjdofu4413d ago (Edited 4413d ago )

@Laxman: 1 NON-UPGRADABLE weapon, though there'll be 2 more on DLC (talon & scythe), still pathetic compared to the enormous amount of weapons of the last 2 games. No essence, dumped down difficulty, regen health, stupid UT (slash every one on screen, really?), only 1 overpowered ninpo, etc. It just lacks variations and creativity on every aspects. There's no sense of rewarding nor re-playability in this game.

You still think I have to waste my money to try this garbage?

SonyPS3604412d ago (Edited 4412d ago )

Shame really...it was a great series.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4412d ago
dragunrising4413d ago

@Laxman

Did you even read the review? It clearly states that the game is easy and repetitive. When has Ninja Gaiden ever been described that way? The series has always been about gameplay and challenge. As a Ninja Gaiden "fan" you should be curious to know if the gameplay is intact or changes in a meaningful way. If you read the review (once again) you would know that gameplay has been dumbed down to an extent that its barely Ninja Gaiden as fan's would remember it. It also says that the story gets in the way of the gameplay. Ninja Gaiden has never a very coherent story however it never got in the way of gameplay. Perhaps the review was a little harsh, then again I haven't played it. The review was at least rational and should make you question a purchase.

I generally I don't put too much stock in a single review however its difficult to dismiss all the problems raised in the review. I will at least give the game a rental and decide from there.

NewMonday4413d ago

did he try playing on a harder difficult? did he bash it because it didn't force you to play hard.

so their are some set piece narrative encounters, when has that been a bad thing?

and his the reviewer's tone made me lose trust from the start.

and the game got 36/40 from famitsu, so it can't be that big a difference

undisputed4412d ago

I know I said I would get this game in a bargain bin but I can't help but try it.Sometimes playing something for yourself and being the judge is the best route.

Sevir4412d ago

Are pretty high. Given all the changes of the I can see it getting a 7 but seriously after Reading this review my consensus is that this guy was very angry! To the point where his bias affected the game. Very unprofessional!

ape0074412d ago

me too man, I remember NINJA GAIDEN for xbox 1 in 2004 was absolutely amazing, gameplay was second to none, graphics was ahead of its time and it had that Magic feel about it, this is sad, i knew the game gonna suck, i saw a preview earlier this month and the level they showed SUCKED as well as graphics

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4412d ago
ElasticLove4413d ago (Edited 4413d ago )

Holy S*it, I wasn't expecting such a low score. But I'll look into this game more before judging it off of one review.

kaveti66164413d ago

I think the score is deserved. I played Ninja Gaiden 2 in 2008 and expected a much more noticeable improvement in Ninja Gaiden 3 than what I saw. Yes, yes, I'm speaking merely about the graphics, but the gameplay videos weren't encouraging, either. There was no dismemberment, and less gore than in Ninja Gaiden 2.

Everything about the game at first sight looks abysmal and I expected it to be a mediocre title. I didn't expect a 3/10 but I'm sure IGN is merely venting it's rage on the game because they're disappointed. People who like the series will probably pick it up and enjoy it anyway, but I think IGN gave it a 3 to punish the developers and publishers for putting so little effort into the game.

Hozi4413d ago

It's not like I ever expected NG's story to win awards but the story of this one is so mundane and dry. I really thought the story in the first two games beat the crap outta this one. and to make matters worse, every thing from bad camera angles to repetitive combat is present in this game. I will wait for Gamespot's review to see if it further solidifies this horrible score IGN has marked it.

jetlian4413d ago Show
DARK WITNESS4413d ago

I played a bit of it at the Eurogamer expo last year.

It was only a demo, but honestly it was enough for me to make up my mind.

I complately lost interest in the game and have no plans to buy it.

NG on the old xbox was my second favorite game on the system after Halo CE.

NG2 was good but there were little things I thought could have made it better...

This on the otherhand, I just don't see how anyone could really defend it. It almost makes Ninja Blade look like real competition for it!

The score does not supprise one bit. maybe the tone he used is a bit off, but in all honesty I don't consider it anymore exaggerated then all those reviews that give games 9+ scores that don't deserve them.

Surfaced4413d ago

Oh man... if the reviews are all like this, people at Team Ninja are going to lose their jobs.

Show all comments (226)
180°

What a New Ninja Gaiden Game Needs to Fix

Screen Rant Writes: Team Ninja knows fans want a new Ninja Gaiden game, but if Ryu Hayabusa is going to come back, there are some things that the series needs to fix.

Read Full Story >>
screenrant.com
Melankolis1524d ago

- Better story, not that it has to be very deep though
- Better level design, on par or even exceed NG1
- Better enemies design, NG3's enemies design were boring and repetitive

TheRealHeisenberg1524d ago

Agreed and bring back the dodge roll. The dash was trash.

Melankolis1524d ago

Yep. I also prefer dodge roll than dash.

NapalmSanctuary1524d ago (Edited 1524d ago )

I'd say just re-add the dodge roll and have both but with different properties. As long as they made both tactically useful in their own ways, it could be really interesting.

Godmars2901524d ago

- No NG has had a good or deep story. Its best has only been about action and enemies.
- Likewise, level design was stages where you fought enemies, which said shallow story connected.
- NG3 utterly forgot that enemies where either trained and highly skilled psychotic killers, or literal demons who'd crack a baby's skull open for fun.

At this point Nioh and Shadows Die Twice have taken NG spot.

TheRealHeisenberg1524d ago

NG Black beats them both. Agree that NG3 was trash. Nioh and Shadows can occupy the spot until NG makes a triumphant return.

NapalmSanctuary1523d ago (Edited 1523d ago )

I take it you never played NG3: Razor's Edge. That game fixed the lack of difficulty. Maybe a little too well with how unfair some of the enemies and bosses were. Still not on par with the previous 2 games but miles ahead of the original NG3 release and well worth playing.

And whats this shit about story. Few action games come close to being on the same level of quality as NG 1&2 and having "good or deep story" didn't get them any closer to it. "Its best" sets it apart and far ahead of almost any other game in the genre except for DMC 3-5 and the Bayonetta series. NG 1&2, along with other games like Doom, prove how little story matters when you get the important aspect of a game (gameplay) right.

Not that Sekiro isn't a great game. The only thing that keeps it from standing shoulder to shoulder with NG 1&2 is its lack of weapon variety and its frame rate issues.

NapalmSanctuary1524d ago

I definitely prefer the Zelda-esque game progression. NG2 was still a great game though.

CorndogBurglar1523d ago

Don't give Ryu some crazy weakness that interrupts literally anything he is doing in order to do some BS animation of him wincing in pain! That garbage ruined NG3

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1523d ago
AK911524d ago

Bring back the difficulty of the first game both 3 and Yaiba (yes I played that POS game) had laughably easy difficulty that it wasn't even funny.

Thundercat771524d ago

With games like NiOh, I don't miss ninja Gaiden at all.

NapalmSanctuary1524d ago

Completely different sub-genres, dude.

CorndogBurglar1523d ago

Nioh was totally different than Ninja Gaiden...

Hungryalpaca1523d ago

Might as well say “wish games like Forza I don’t miss Mario kart”

Asuka1524d ago

Bring back the difficulty.

NapalmSanctuary1523d ago

I want a Ninja Gaiden Black and Ninja Gaiden 2 remaster for all consoles/PC. Complete with peak difficulties intact and maybe some new weapons and outfits. The problem with the Sigma series was that 1) they removed most of the puzzle elements 2) they nerfed the difficulty and 3) they seriously reduced the number of enemies on screen at a time in many places.

Show all comments (22)
110°

The History of Ninja Gaiden: The Resurrection

In the conclusion to a three part series, CV takes a look at the most recent Ninja Gaiden games, for better and for worse.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
spicelicka1577d ago

They need to make a true sequel to Ninja Gaiden 2, that was the most satisfying combat I've experienced in a hack n slash game.

micdagoat191577d ago

been playing 1&2 on and off since they were released. I usually will play until I get frustrated then take another year off lol. Nver tried 3 or the 4th one even though they are in my backlog.

Domestupidname1577d ago

I tried to go back to Sigma but good god those controls are just insufferable. Couldn't do it.

210°

Fatality: Games That Killed Their Franchises (Or At Least Put Them On A Long Hiatus)

Phil writes, "Sometimes all it takes is one game to make a long-running or promising franchise become dead in the water, maligned to irrelevancy and just a memory in the annals of gaming history. It's a dog-eat-dog industry where it doesn't matter if the franchise has been around for ages or for milliseconds--just one or two failures and you're done. That's the case with these franchises, all of which I'm sad to see are currently nowhere to be found. Whether any of these will return for a kick-ass comeback or not is up in the air, but what is known is that for many, these franchises met truly unfortunate ends."

Read Full Story >>
superphillipcentral.com
PiNkFaIrYbOi2112d ago

For Tony Hawk's Pro Skater really the first 3 were really the only good ones. After that they sort of went downhill.

Skull5212111d ago

Biggest shame I think is SOCOM. Easily Sony’s best franchise by a long shot and they just let it die.

BlackIceJoe2111d ago

I was going to say SOCOM too. That was one of the best strategy games on the market and then Sony turned it Into a normal shooter.

Dabigsiebowski2110d ago

I thought Underground was pretty good

Segata2112d ago

Klonoa was great but released at a bad time on just 1 system with no marketing. Razors Edge fixed many issues with NG3 vanilla and is a guilty pleasure. Another one that killed a franchise is Lost Planet 3. The better game was Japan only in EX Troopers on PS3. I also would say Marvel vs Capcom Infinite killed the series. I know it's less than a year old but the writing is on the wall. Silent Hill series as soon as Konami gave it to western devs and also made mobile spinoffs.

CorndogBurglar2111d ago (Edited 2111d ago )

With all the licensing effort it takes to make an MvC game you are probably right.

Which sucks because people love MvC. Bad decisions were made with the last one, that's all. But I guarantee if they made a new MvC and put a good roster in with 3 man teams and no easy mode combos then people would go right back to it.

Unfortunately, most companies won't be willing to make another sequel as soon as the latest title flops. Even though MvC Infinite wouldn't have flopped if they had just made different decisions.

81BX2111d ago

Nice try buddy. Then why have they made 1,000,000,000,000,000. Games? Cod has never gotten it wrong...over and over and over.

FPS_D3TH2111d ago

Never gotten it wrong? I guess in terms of how to get kids to steal money out of parents wallets. It’s done plenty wrong lol

81BX2111d ago

Lol. Little money grabbers! I remember when paying for map packs was a big deal. Now we have to pay for everything. This is crazy

REDGUM2110d ago

It's all well and good saying COD sells well, which I don't deny, but that doesn't make it a good game. It merely means people want more of the same,game play, as you put it, over and over and over!

If it's so good, why are more people playing Battlefield 4 over the more current COD releases!

People impulse buy i recon, pre order a game before it's been shown to the public then just stick with it when it releases hoping for change!

I Find COD games much of the same with every release which is why I'd call id a dying franchise.
These kids will grow up soon and realise there's more out there than just corridor shooting games.

It's just an opinion afterall.

DialgaMarine2111d ago (Edited 2111d ago )

When has CoD died or gone on hiatus though? You may not like them, but tens of millions of people do, and buy it every year. People seriously need to shut up and leave that franchise alone. It’s not hurting anyone, and the whining is seriously getting old.

T2X2111d ago

I know right? Those games are always fun. At least IMO. The fun varies a bit depending on the location and theme, but overall, always pretty damn good.

81BX2111d ago (Edited 2111d ago )

Youre 100% wrong. They need to be called out just like every other company. That's why they returned to boots on ground. You let them treat you however they like... some of us chose to be treated how we like

DialgaMarine2110d ago

You say that as if I’m an avid CoD player. I don’t mind the series, but it’s definitely not my favorite. The bitching, however, was old back in 2010. 99% of people that do it only do so because they see others doing it. You don’t like CoD? Play something else. It’s not supposed to cater to fans of other franchises.

MWH2111d ago

I love Klonoa, there's always hope for a new game.

Pickledpepper2111d ago

I loved the dead space 1+2 hated 3. Played through them so many times but found number 3 such a bore to get through, really hope they pick this back up.

PowerOfTheCloud2111d ago (Edited 2111d ago )

Dead space 1 is imo unrivaled when it comes to horror games and part 2 was already kind of a let down by still good. I didn't even play part 3 because i didn't like the direction that game went.

Wish they will reboot dead space one day .

Pickledpepper2111d ago

I totally agree with you on that, dead space 1 was the pinnacle of survival horror and dead space 2 was still a great game, I have all achievements for 1 and 2 and both games still hold up well against modern games, 3 was a complete let down I did finish it just for satisfaction but had no fun from the game at all, found it very boring to say the least.

CorndogBurglar2111d ago

For me, the only reason Dead Space 2 wasn't as good as the original is because it wasn't new anymore. But when you think about it, DS2 was still just as good of a horror game. DS1 was so good because everything you came across was new and terrifying.

I remember the feeling the first time I played DS1. No other game, before or since, has given me that feeling that something is going to jump out and attack with every footstep you took. Talk about great atmosphere and tension!

REDGUM2110d ago

and the Resistance games franchise!

Fist4achin2111d ago

Agreed, plus I didn't care for what they did to the weapons crafting system.

Show all comments (32)