Battlefield 3 Sweepstakes Announced

Majin-vegeta4547d ago

Number 3 would be so awesome alienware pc with bf games:o *Faints*.

LeonVesper4547d ago

I rather have the cash. Personally, I would use the 5k to build a better rig that no Alienware PC can touch.

JonahNL4547d ago (Edited 4547d ago )

Sweepstakes? SWEEPSTAKES? I'd rather have EA and DICE focus on releasing a patch for Battlefield 3. I am one of the many players experiencing freezes, rubber banding, crashes and so on. This game is a diamond in the rough and it needs a shitload of polish.

Eromu4547d ago

They have been patching several issues, you just don't notice because it's server-side.

JonahNL4547d ago

That's the whole point. We need a client side patch (and another server side one, while we're at it).

Agree 0 Disagree 0

Majin-vegeta4547d ago

Damn really??I experience lag but only on Caspian border and Tehran Highway.Only frozen on me once since it was released,and no crashes so far.

PS3 version btw

JonahNL4547d ago (Edited 4547d ago )

I'm on PC, so that might explain it a bit. It differs per server, but overall I'm experiencing a lot of issues.

Agree 0 Disagree 0

Hufandpuf4547d ago

After they stabilize the game, connection issues and such, then they can focus on gameplay tweaks. I really hope they nerf that mortar.

Fil1014547d ago

yeah i still cant log onto the battlelog.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4547d ago

100°

Battlefield Needs the Glory Days of BF3 and Bad Company 2 Back

FallenAngel1984|521d ago |Opinion piece|22|

Whether it comes through remakes or a new game with a similar style, DICE should aim to revive the glory days of Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2.

Battlefield 3 Battlefield: Bad Company 2 PC PS3 Xbox 360 gamerant.com

Read Full Story >>

gamerant.com

- Comments (22)

Expand all

masterfox521d ago

hmmm I think there will be no old BF glory days for EA since they are loyal to their greediness and laziness :D

Reply Agree 9 Disagree 0

Knightofelemia521d ago

You're asking for a miracle with EA that will never happen unless they can exploit the money making schemes behind it.

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 0

MadLad521d ago

We'll see what happens now that Zampella is overlooking the series.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 1

521d ago

Replies(1)

Father__Merrin521d ago

Anyone that wants to plat bf3 you can still go ahead and play it

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 5

Psychotica521d ago

Why are they so reluctant to create a new Bad Company??

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 0

INMATEofARKHAM521d ago

Single player campaigns take time and effort... EA ain't got time for that.

Fluke_Skywalker521d ago

DICE have already stated that they actually don't know how to. They literally have no idea what made BC2 so good and clearly have no idea how to repeat it.

Yui_Suzumiya521d ago

Definitely agree with the title. If they make Bad Company 3 then that would definitely be a step in the right direction!

ChubbyBlade521d ago

It’s done. The current development team has no idea why people liked BF.

Reply Agree 4 Disagree 0

CorndogBurglar521d ago

Which is so ignorant it almost physically hurts.

They have the damn templates lol. Everyone LOVED Battlefield all the way up through BF4. Everything after BF4 is where fans started getting divided because they started dumbing down the gameplay.

So they need to go back to the favorites. Bad Company 2. BF3 and BF4.

Take those games. Take the exact same gameplay. Update the graphics. Add some different game modes. Make new maps. Add new guns. Choose two armies. And make a single player campaign.

That's seriously it. They need to quit trying to make BF something it isn't. They have everything they need. Why they can't figure this out just hurts my brain trying to understand.

Orchard521d ago

BF3? They need to go back to BF2 for the mainline. Heck, I'd settle for true-to-source remakes of BF2 and BC2 (w/ Vietnam). Everything they've done in the 'modern' era is just bad.

CorndogBurglar521d ago

Anything from BF2 - BF4 would work fine. Those were all great games.

MadLad521d ago

I thought BF3 and 4 were great, and I've been playing since 1942.

Demetrius521d ago (Edited 521d ago )

Doubt they will smh which is messed up

TheColbertinator521d ago

EAis pretending to be one of those deaf mutes

Profchaos521d ago

I've not played 2042 myself but after v I don't feel like it. I played a few hours of v with friends but it feels ultra sterile I can't figure it out but the game looks and feels clinical. The storys in the campaign were also bland and uninteresting and felt like a dull trudge through checkpoints as you waited for an ending.

I've played the franchise dating back to it's original PC launch and PS2 spin off games I did enjoy 1 overall and it's take on placing you in different scenarios and battles was interesting but not all that good imo as you couldn't really connect with any characters longer than 2 hours.

hardline for all the hate it recived was a fun story and a new take but a bad mp game

I feel like v overall was the turning point and instead of showing the gritty reality of war they turned everything sterile and presented it in a clean cut boring frame in order to pump it full of weird micro transactions overall they spent far to much time on trying to implant ray tracing and other graphical flourishes and forgot to make the game enjoyable