130°

Neocrisis: Did anyone actually “win” at E3?

Neocrisis: Here we go again... Some days before E3 started, I heard some people claiming this was gonna be the best E3 of all time. Why? Simply because they thought it was gonna be, no explanations were made, they just said it, and people swallowed it. The problem with this, is that not only E3 has been, well not mediocre, but it hasn't been up to the expectations of the thousands of gamers out there, (even if some of you blindly believe it did).

Read Full Story >>
neocrisis.com
Surfaced4696d ago (Edited 4696d ago )

Probably not. Some failed harder than others, but I wouldn't bother with discerning a clear winner.

jazzking20014696d ago (Edited 4696d ago )

agreed, instead of asking who won i think its better to ask who was suked the least lol

necronzero4696d ago

And this was supposed to be the best E3 ever... *Looks at those websites who dared to publish such bs*

Skip_Bayless4695d ago (Edited 4695d ago )

Sony won. Microsoft showed multiplatform games and showed what we knew was coming out already. Nintendo showed us lots of things that won't come out until 2 or 3 years in the future. Sony showed us stuff that we will be excited in the coming months and next year.

ATiElite4696d ago

1. Battlefield 3 = it's simply the biggest baddest and best looking game E3 has ever seen or anybody else for that matter. Kingdoms of Armular, Mass Effect 3, Uncharted 3, Gears3, Skyrim and others all looked great but are several notches below BF3

Tie

2. PSVita is super duper hot. it has the potential to over come Nintendo's dominance on the Hand held market or at least get 50% market share. The simple fact that a model comes with 3G means the PSVita can be the perfect all in one device. Music, Games, Video, Internet and Now Cell Phone! I'm sure a hack or App will becoming SOON to allow the PSVita to act as a Phone.

2. Wii-U Nintendo knows their role and they have pumped up the volume and entered the HD era but have brought the most innovative device to the industry. The hand held controller with screen will open up a MEGA TON of new gaming options. In 3 years Sony and Microsoft will be copying Nintendo AGAIN!

3. Playstation 3 and PC. with PS3 getting the Dust 514 Exclusive along with having cross-platform support in Portal 2 I think this is the start of a great experiment in getting PC gamers together with consolers. With todays consoles being basically low end PC's i feel Sony is doing the right thing buy bridging the gap.

Looser...
Exclusives.
this E3 saw the lowest amount of exclusives ever. 95% of the titles had multiple platforms listed and with the Wii-u coming out most games will be made for 4 platforms maybe 5 if you add PSVita.

Optical_Matrix4696d ago

I don't think Sony will be copying Nintendo in 3 years. Why? Because using a touch device as a controller is one of things Sony is pushing with PlayStation Vita. They just haven't designed a whole system around it. Surely you've seen the 'Transfarring' system Kojima is pushing with MGS HD Collection and ZoE HD Collection. It's the same thing as Wii-U. Both companies are innovating. Meanwhile Microsoft is left behind.

In my opinion Nintendo won E3 but Sony came extremely close. Nintendo won because of these things:

- Wii-U Announcement
- Showing Zelda in HD
- 3DS Line up consisting of Super Mario Bros, Mario Kart 3D, Luigi's Mansion 2, StarFox 64, Kid Icarus Uprising, Tekken
- Announcing next gen Super Smash Bros. for Wii-U and 3DS
- Announcing Pikmin 3 for Wii-U today

But Sony had plenty of announcements I loved as well;

- PS Vita Pricing
- Sly 4
- God of War Origins
- PS Vita game line up is nuts. Shinobido, Dragons Crown, Uncharted, Little Big Planet, Mod Nation Racers, Street Fighter X Tekken...it's nuts.

Overall I was pretty satisfied with this E3.

jazzking20014696d ago (Edited 4696d ago )

i think that MS focused too heavily on Kinect
it will leave lots of gamers angry

Agent-864696d ago (Edited 4696d ago )

Good call ATi. I was predicting the BF3 would be the E3 winner and getting crap for it. PS Vita was cool and I think Sony really nailed the price point. The PS3/PC integration thing is also cool and has great potential. The only one off your list that I'm a little iffy on is the Wii-U. The controller with touch screen seems cool with lots of potential uses. Only concern I have is the comfort factor. 15-30 minutes of use probably won't matter, but what about those sessions that go on for hours? I'm thinking it will be really uncomfortable after a while.

jazzking20014696d ago

the wii u control idea is cool
but if you to look at both the tv and controller screens, i think playing will become harder

ATiElite4696d ago

Nintendo controllers always hurt my hands for some reason. The Wiiu controller seems like the standards format but just that your hands will be wider apart than normal.

IDK i gotta get a hands on test.

DeeZee4696d ago

No, but I was most impressed by Sony's event. Which is shocking because I thought Nintendo would impress me the most with a new console, but they didn't show enough.

M-A-R-S-H-A-L-L4695d ago

Sony's conference was the most impressive, IMO.

sikbeta4695d ago

Sony conference was the best, it wasn't something mind-blowing, but compared to the others, was consistently good...

60°

Tales Of Graces Ƒ Retro Review – Holding Out For a Hero

Gary Green said: Namco Bandai heard the call of many fans asking for the PlayStation release of Tales of Graces which was originally released seemingly exclusively for the Wii back in 2009. If you’re acquainted with the Tales series then Graces f won’t be something entirely new to you, yet if you’re a newcomer then you’ll find a plethora of gameplay mechanics and nuances that distinguish this series from other JRPGs. While the game finds itself following the traditional archetype of JRPGs, such as a somewhat clichéd story, Graces has something to offer to both veterans and newcomers alike.

Read Full Story >>
pslegends.com
GoodGuy096h ago

Odd this and the xillia games still haven't gotten remasters yet.

110°

It's A Crime That There's No Sleeping Dogs 2 Yet

Huzaifah from eXputer: "Sleeping Dogs from the early 2010s is one of the best open-world games out there but in dire need of a resurgence."

LG_Fox_Brazil1d 2h ago

I agree, I consider the first one a cult classic already

isarai21h ago

You say "yet" as if it's even possible anymore. United Front Games is gone, along with anyone that made this game what it is

CrimsonWing697h ago

That’s what happens when games sell poorly. And I’ve seen people wonder why people cry when a game sells badly… this is your answer.

solideagle6h ago

Majority of the time it's true but if a company/publisher is big (in terms of money), they can take a hit or 2. e.g. I am not worried about Rebirth sales as Square will make Remake 3 anyway but if FF 17 doesn't sell then Square might need to look for alternative. <-- my humble opinion

Abnor_Mal6h ago

Doesn’t Microsoft own the IP now since they acquired Activision?

Abnor_Mal2h ago

Oh okay, Activision owned True Crime, but when that didn’t sell as intended it was canceled. Six months later Square Enix bought the rights and changed the title to Sleeping Dogs.*

*As per Wikipedia

boing15h ago(Edited 5h ago)

Sleeping Dogs was a sleeper hit back then. It was fantastic. It actually still is. Would love a sequel to this, or at least a revive of True Crime series.

100°

Lord of the Rings: Battle for Middle-earth II - PC Wore it Better

Lord of the Rings: Battle for Middle-earth II was an intriguing and unique RTS title, that sadly suffered in its console port.

dadavis199218h ago

Was just thinking about this game and wishing I had a way to revisit it. The way EA scrubs these titles from existence once their licensing runs out is horrid.

Michiel19897h ago

there is a client made by modders and it also works online.

kevco336h ago

Indeed. The game can still be played online on PC.

Xbox 360 players, though? Bang outta luck.