200°

Top 5 Professional Gamers of All-Time

Overall, this list should provide you with some astonishing facts about some very remarkable pro gamers and serve as a launching pad to jump further in to the subject of competitive e-sports.

Read Full Story >>
blog.gamestaq.com
CrimsonEngage4705d ago

Why is Fatal1ty not on this list? Garbage.

ATiElite4704d ago

I agree Fatal1ty should be added to this list. He is the pioneer and has been the world wide number 1 Champion in 5 different games.

Daigo – The Beast is Unleashed.

WOW this is like the buffalo bills coming back and beating the Houston oilers after being down 35-3. I still can't believe the skill Daigo has. All chun-li had to do was spit on Ken and he would have been done.

OneSneakyMofo4704d ago (Edited 4704d ago )

They forgot

6. OneSneakyMofo

:]

synide4704d ago (Edited 4704d ago )

Fatality is not on the list, because despite his immense popularity, his stats do not stack up to the other quake players in the article.

Competitively, Fatality made his name in Quake, however, does not have nearly as many top placings as Cooller. Also ask any Quaker, as good as he was, he probably wouldn't make a top 5 list devoted only to quake.

Fatality shined brightest at a game you probably never even heard of, Painkiller. Watching him battle Voo in the Painkiller CPL World Tour was one of the most awesome moments of competitive gaming to-date.

Just because he is the most popular, doesn't mean he would be named top 5. The article is based on statistics mostly, and the players named have all mostly shown a very strong record over a long period of time. Fatality stopped placing highly when eSports exploded and the talent fields widened considerably.

The world of competitive gaming is much deeper than most people think, and this article is designed to show some of the most respected and accomplished names across 5 different games.

If anyone would like to stack up Fat's stats vs the fellows in this article, feel free, but if you decide to do a little research of your own, I am confident you will find his celebrity to be larger than his achievements.

No knock to him, he would pwn 99% of any gamer. I've watched him go without a single death at E3 exhibitions.

He is by far the most well-known competitive gamer, and I understand why people would expect to see him in here. Hopefully the article shined a light on how wide eSports is, and how accomplished certain players are, despite not being household names. I encourage anyone to look deeper into the names mentioned, and you will likely find many more.

ATiElite4704d ago (Edited 4704d ago )

Ummm i disagree.

Fatal1ty was the worlds number one gamer in 5 count them 1,2,3,4,5 different games. in 2000 he won 5 Quake tournaments.

so whoever you wanna list (Cooller who ONLY plays Quake) may be the best Quake player but Fatal1ty was number 1 in 2000 and number 1 in 4 other games during his career.

Quake III Arena
Painkiller
Alien vs. Predator
Doom 3
Quake 4

here is Cooler vs. Fatal1ty

synide4703d ago (Edited 4703d ago )

@ATiElite

A couple points to be made (sorry can't reply to your post, i guess threading doesn't go that deep)

1. AVP and Doom 3 don't really count. The only real competitions for those games were exhibitional and I believe there really was only one competition for each of them. Ask any pro gamer, they just don't really count. The publishers of those games put up the money for those tournaments, and nobody really respected them as actual competitive titles.

2. To be the best at any game, you really do have to focus on just that game, or that series if there are multiple games in the series. Look at most of the people on the list, they are very focused players. That is why the article is broken out into games, because the best players stay within their game.

In terms of quake, quake 3/quake live are the judging points. Compare coollers wins to fatalities. He's been playing nearly as long, and is still at the top today, and has more than 5x the accomplishments. This is mostly because Fatality dropped out when he stopped winning, and if you ask him yourself, there are several other players that trump him in terms of skill and accomplishments, even he will admit that.

Fatality is more of an ambassador to eSports. He got really popular, and turned that into a platform to create a brand, and focused less on actually competing. He has a very inspiring story and deserves the recognition he gets, but when you want to name the actual greatest players, you have take a look at stats, and where eSports have come to, not who is the most popular.

As for the video you posted, you can find plenty more videos of cooller defeating fatality quite handily. The one I just watched had him winning 11 to -1. You will have a very difficult time proving that in terms of quake, fatality was better than cooller.

When it comes to Painkiller, Fatatlity was probably #1 or #2. He lost plenty to Voo in Painkiller, and most pro quakers didn't even try Painkiller, it just wasn't nearly as good a game as Quake.

In terms of #1 placings across their lifetime, Fatality has 11. Cooller has 42. And he is still playing today. The numbers are even more staggering if you compare 2nd and 3rd place medals.

Ninja-Sama4704d ago

Fatal1ty should have been on that list instead of the Halo player.

CraigUK4704d ago

Daigo is my favourite Pro Gamer, apparently he is trying his hand and MvC3, I would love to see how he does in tournament play for that.

CraigUK4704d ago

Disagree with my opinion? LOL

MARKUS_MAX1MUS4704d ago (Edited 4704d ago )

Get used to it mate, people round here will argue your opinion all day despite the fact its utterly pointless and wont change anything.

captain-obvious4704d ago

the list needs to be bigger
and have more PC gamers in since PC is like the battle front of pro gaming

synide4704d ago

I agree, it's hard to narrow it this small.

3/5 games were PC.

CNXN4704d ago

LoL Halo at 1 ... pssh was that a joke or something... not saying theyre bad, but halo really...

synide4704d ago (Edited 4704d ago )

It was a little misleading with the page-numbering.

It is not meant to be a #5-#1 article. Trying to order these games/players would be nearly impossible.

It's just meant to be the 5 best, sorted by game. Truly creating a list that is actually numbered would probably be the debate of the decade amongst pro gaming fans.

IF we were to # it, it would probably be in the reverse order.

Show all comments (17)
120°

Quake 4 - Launching the Xbox 360 FPS Addiction

Quake 4 arrived as an Xbox 360 launch title soon after its PC debut, and heralded an era in which the single-player FPS dominated.

DefenderOfDoom2144d ago

For me, what launched the single player FPS campaign on consoles was Playstation DOOM which I bought during the launch window for the Playstation 1 back in 1995 which ended up being the best port of DOOM on consoles back in the 90s .

Jingsing144d ago

Still plays great today. Shoulder button strafe shooting is fun.

OtterX144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

Oh man, that William's Doom on PS1 had the best music/ambience! Really sounded hellish and it still sounds amazing today. I always preferred it over the original Midi music from PC. Doom 64 was really good too for that era!

DefenderOfDoom2144d ago

I hope Nightdive does a remaster of QUAKE 4 to be released on all current platforms .

OtterX143d ago

For sure. It was one of the 360 launch titles I picked up and enjoyed
it. But I really hope they do a Quake 3 Arena with crossplay option too. I recently went back and played on PC, and had a ton of fun. Would be nice to have servers officially reopened with a retail remaster! The Unreal Tournament and Quake 3 days are my fondest memories of online shooters.

shinoff2183144d ago

There were definitely big fps games on console before this.

Profchaos143d ago

You could do far worse on the 360 back in the day it was a excellent port of a at the time fairly demanding PC game.

90°

It Seems Pretty Clear Why StarCraft 3 is Not a Thing Yet

Even though fans have been clamoring for a StarCraft 3 for years now, it seems like Blizzard really has no reason to spend time making one.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
StormSnooper154d ago

They sort of ran the story as far as it could go.

Also, it seems like blizzard is more busy with mediocrity at this point in time.

Jingsing154d ago

The problem with Blizzard is they have franchises that don't need sequels. People are happy playing the games that they previously made. What they need is new games, none of this business of trying to transport the old audience into a new version of an old game which only ends up nickle and dime'ing users.

170°

$15 horse for WoW made more money than StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty

Jason Hall, currently an indie developer and former Blizzard employee, has been sharing some really interesting stories from his long career in the industry for a while now. Some of them are truly insightful, while others may seem depressing.

Read Full Story >>
gameworldobserver.com
Sciurus_vulgaris156d ago

I’m a little shocked that StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty sold only around 6 million copies. The original StarCraft did over 11 million. Maybe Blizzard was too leisurely in releasing StarCraft 2? Starcraft 2 came out 12 years after it’s predecessor.

Plague-Doctor27156d ago (Edited 156d ago )

Im surprised too. Starcraft was still a huge name in 2010. It was kinda the only new RTS around and other genres like MOBAs hadn't really kicked off yet. I do remember at the time sentiment around the game was
pretty angry the game was being split into 3 but I doubt that would have impacted sales to that degree

Sciurus_vulgaris156d ago

For a long time I believed StarCraft II sold on par or better than its predecessor. There was so much hype for the game. Plus it had a pretty strong E-Sports scene for a few years.

Myself and half a dozen friends all bought StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty and played it religiously for a full year. While I bought the expansions, most of my friends did not. RPGs seem to be a generally low selling genre.

Nerdmaster155d ago

I'm not shocked at all. This was an early example of Blizzard being greedy. Instead of releasing a complete experience, splitting Starcraft 2 in 3 parts so it could make us purchase it 3 times if we wanted to know the whole story and play story mode with the other races.

Sciurus_vulgaris155d ago

I originally had that stance. However, Wings of Liberty, was just as long, if not longer than StarCraft 1. The expansions were of decent length too and added a good amount of additional content.

il-JumperMT156d ago

and people wonder why we are having mtx in everything. i blame the people who actual buy them.

Nerdmaster155d ago

It's interesting he used Brazil as an example of the importance of regional pricing. Nowadays many companies on Steam are setting their prices in Brazil as high as, if not more than, their price in USA. I simply refused to buy a few games when I noticed that's the case.

Extermin8or3_155d ago

This right here is the fucking problem.

155d ago