1080°
8.5

IGN: Gran Turismo 5 Review

IGN - "Gran Turismo 5 is a 10/10 simulator wrapped up in a 5/10 game – it’s driving is as exhilarating as anything that’s gone before, and its slavish obsession with the minutiae of many of its cars ensure it's an encyclopaedia of automotive delights. Its brilliance on the track, however is matched by its sloppiness off of it, and there’s a lack of polish that would at one time have seemed sacrilegious to the series. Ultimately its driving wins out to ensure that it’s still a great game, but it leaves that nagging doubt; this could have been a masterpiece were it not for the fact that Polyphony was so absorbed with the detail that it took its eye off the ball."

shutupandplay4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

Not bad, I did expect a little higher though.

Looks like Forza holds the crown this generation.

toaster4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

In b4 the storm!!! Like what people have said before, the hype got the best of people. This would have been scored high if people's expectations for it weren't through the roof. Nevertheless 8.5 is not at all bad, in my book that's a damn good score. It's about time they released it, if it went on for any longer I'm sure people would have just been more disappointed.

WHOOO it's getting hot in here. 250 degrees in 10 minutes! 7.0 on Presentation isn't surprising to me, one look at the main menu and I was shocked at what a clusterfuck it was. Compare that to the streamline and simple menu system in GRID and I can easily see why it got what it got in that category. Loading times are bad as well, but then again it has load a crap load of stuff just for a single race.

LordMarius4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

Just as I expected, for shame
might pick it up when its on sale

Bobbykotickrulesz4892d ago

8.5?

Holy shit, the fanboy tornado is about to blow this town away. And by town, I mean website.

LoVeRSaMa4892d ago

"Gran Turismo 5 is a 10/10 simulator wrapped up in a 5/10 game "

Its a Driving Simulator anyway?

Anton Chigurh4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

"A shame, as drive into a wall hard and long enough (though you'll have to attack it with the ferocity and persistence of a dog on heat) and the damage model will slowly begin to expose itself – something it will more readily do, we hope, after a future patch. "

"Gran Turismo 5 is a 10/10 simulator wrapped up in a 5/10 game"

4892d ago
nix4892d ago

"the hype got the best of people."

but GTAIV still got 10/10. it really depends on people what they want to focus on.. positive or negative!

i'm anyway getting my copy NOT BECAUSE some review said so.. because i know it will be great!

OmarsAccount4892d ago

Good reviews for GT all around. Who didn't think otherwise?

But regarding Forza and GT. Can't we just get along? They're both great racing sim franchises that both deserve to be played.

Game on

RememberThe3574892d ago

Thats a great point. Thing this reviewer thought were not well done don't seem that bad to me. It's all a matter of perspective.

What the review says that is most important is that on the track the game is golden.

hay4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

I feel like after the rain. Trolls are coming from below their bridges.

The Fight has taught me one thing. Don't trust the reviewers. Most of them are weak, nitpicky, and pretty much unprofessional.

And since I did prefer GT5P over Forza 3(which is also really good game), I'm quite optimistic here.

How better gaming community if people calling themself gamers would actually play games, not pledge allegiance to brands.
If you're a fighting games fan, you enjoy Street Fighter, Tekken, KoF, Guilty Gear or BlazBlue.
If you're puzzle games fan, you play most of them.
If you're an RPG fan, you want to play most of them, at least the best ones.
There's really more sh!t in journalism since MS entered the business. There always have been fanboy wars, but it wasn't so terrible before american kids joined the fight.

I don't really remember so much fights before MS. FPS fans played Call of Duty and Medal of Honor, when there was a new game they didn't downplay it(xbox/halo fanboys).
The same was with racing genre. Even during xbox times people played previous Forza's, Project Gotham Racing, Gran Turismo, Need for Speed and many others.

That was a before MS fanboys had become tools. Buying catchy phrases, being manipulated by Turn 10 trolling, blindly believing the PR company.
Fanboy is a fanboy, but MS made tools of them fueling the fanboy war.

I know it's too much reason for some of you, but... Would you kindly enjoy being a GAMER? It's what kept us together, gaming was a reason we met really cool people, had friends with similar interests, it's a passion, hobby, even love, but some idiots think it's fun to wage a nonsensical war on this field.

It's like: "My stamps are definitive and your suck!"

Bereaver4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

You guys are blinded by what you think instead of opening your eyes to what it really is.

I've said it any many other articles.

It's because they are judging it for what it isn't instead of what it is.

They said 10/10 for simulation. THAT IS WHAT IT IS!

*edit*

My question is, how long did they play it? Did they get a chance to unlock all the stuff in the game?

They said something about the damage modeling, but what about the level 20 thing that's been going around. Was that proven false?

evrfighter4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

finally. It's good to see reviewers waking up and realizing that graphics don't = ZOMGAHSUM!!!!!11!!

gameplay is where its at. and gt5 in essence is the same as the previous 4+. Should be lower imo.

and no. GT5 while looking good is close to a real simulator. The real racing sims like gtr 2 and iracing are old as all hell but untouchable when it comes to racing sims.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

MerkinMax4892d ago

"It's a level of care that hasn't been extended to the standard cars that form the bulk of Gran Turismo 5's car list. While they're far from unattractive, their PlayStation 2 heritage shows, with textures looking flat and comparatively lifeless, and the omission of a cockpit view and a blunted damage model gives them a distinctly second class flavor."

That's a huge letdown :(

tigerstyle4892d ago

still picking up this awesome piece of ass ;)

nickjkl4892d ago

wait has anyone watched the ign review

its strange really you can tell what he hasnt done and what he has and how he plays

at 3:05 he blames the computer ai for brakign on a corner while he floors it

he also says damage is minimal when its really only truly apparent later in the game

this proves that he hasnt played the game for long

look at this video novemeber 23rd 2010 level 40 and it shows massive damage its to ease you into the game but the damage he shows is like hes level 5 and then wrote the review i wouldnt trust this guys opinion at all

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Dee_914892d ago

how the hype I personally have for a game effect the review score from a site ?

jjohan354892d ago

This is a racing sim, not a car crash sim for car manufacturers. I never understood the hype for car damage, esp when Forza's damage barely dents the car at 100mph.

syanara4892d ago

One thing I must say about the review, as I am still reviewing the game myself is that we definitely disagree about the soundtrack. Gran Turismo 5 single handedly has the best soundtrack for any game and I am not exaggerating. the perfect mix between jazzy tunes and more of todays rock or punk rock style to make a very smooth soundtrack with additions of bassanova and other titles just complete the list, I personally would have given the GT5 Soundtrack a 10/10 in a heartbeat. bravo to the sound designer for GT5

ExplosionSauce4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

Haha just saying.

Wow, these reviews have very different views
http://www.destructoid.com/...

I don't think they should count the Standard cars against the game. The Premium cars are pretty much the "real" GT5/PS3 cars.
Standards are extra.

blackbeld4892d ago

Just like I predicted before IGN will give it 8,5/10.

Those M0thf#ckers.

Every PS3 game that deserves 10/10 they will give it 8,5/10

Sooo predictable.

MiloGarret4892d ago Show
Brewski0074892d ago

Buy the game, play it a few days, meet up in a bar, and rate it ourselves?
K thnx bai!

Aquanox4892d ago Show
rextyrann4892d ago

tbh everyone who is already putting up a review now is not reliable at all. and everyone who does believe in those reviews dont deserve better lol

have this game since yesterday and to unlock all the features and really knowing the complete game with all the options will take even the best drivers at least a week 24/7...
some pple might even never unlock all the extreme/profesional stuff.

there is just no way that some busy editors who have several job stuffs to do to get even close to a good insight into this game after 4-5 days with only few hours each day. its freaking HUGE!!!

give this game 2-3 weeks hardcore testing + online mode testing. then we can talk about real and significant reviews kids...

im waiting for ign to eat their words in a few weeks lmao. the dude who did this review has failed his job discription totally.

Mmmkay4892d ago

i'll rate it 9.5 after two days of playing...

morganfell4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

You either want licensed cars or you do not. If you want them then be prepared to abide by restrictions issued by the manufacturer. The fact that IGN is oblivious to this truth is a testament to their almost global idiocy.

If it is the best hands down then explain why it hasn't received the top score. This is because most websites and publications, IGN included haven't the slightest idea of a standard. They also have absolutely no editorial control.

Game blogs may be crap on a lot of occasions but at least handful of them comprehend the meaning of the word "standard".

Once again, PS3 exclusives are held to a much higher bar and crap titles on other platforms are given a pass on the very items with which they accost PS3 games.

The only way to deal with sites like IGN is to stop clicking and stop visiting.

People can say what they want but the evidence provided by PLASTICA-MAN is irrefutable.

pixelsword4891d ago (Edited 4891d ago )

When Sony doesn't give money out to advertise, their games always score low; when the money is dolled out, the games score high.

God of War III, good advertising, good 9.3 score... the easiest in the series to beat.

GT5, not a lot of advertising, 8.5 score, easiest to say that's it's the best sim racing game to date.

Not let's contrast Gran Turismo 5 and a well known flop: too Human.

Too Human got a 7.8, which means that Gran Turismo is just a little over one standard deviation above Too Human in their own website whereas others gave that game very low scores. But why? Advertising. Too Human was everywhere. Granted, I liked it, but it was no 7.8; it was like a 6.8 because of the stiff gameplay, the bad dialogue and the bery long and unavoidable animation sequence for each and every death; and yes; you'll die a number of times because of the type of gameplay if you don't shape the player according to your playing style.

At any rate, remember that when any game comes out... that's why gamespot fired someone for not giving Kane and Lynch a high score, huh? Just watch the advertising on a site and you'll be able to predict a game's score on the bigger sites.

I thought everyone knew this by now lol

pixelsword4891d ago

I also want to add, once again ladies and gentlemen:

you can't spell ignorance without I-G-N.

thesummerofgeorge4891d ago

@Bereaver

"It's because they are judging it for what it isn't instead of what it is. They said 10/10 for simulation. THAT IS WHAT IT IS! "

Precisely. You hit the nail on the head.

+ Show (29) more repliesLast reply 4891d ago
T9X694892d ago

"Gran Turismo 5 is a 10/10 simulator wrapped up in a 5/10 game "

Wasn't expecting that.

RememberThe3574892d ago

Yes you were. lol

I really don't get that statement. The game is a simulator and they say that the driving is great, but from what I've seen of the menus and all the off the track stuff it looks really good. Far from 5/10.

T9X694892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

@RememberThe357

You can read my mind now? Well you read it wrong. I was actually expecting IGN to give it a 9.5. Gamespot on the other hand, after their horrible hour video coverage, a 8.5 wouldn't surprise me, but IGN, no I expected more.

EDIT: Well what do you expect, GT fans have been bashing Forza left and right for the past few weeks on the anticipation of GT5 saying how shitty Forza is. So now that it's scoring lower than Forza, it's kind of expected. It's like bullying a kid at school for month while he sits back and says nothing, then one day jumps down your throat. Karma is a bitch.

RememberThe3574892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

It's really hard to read these big sites. With such huge staffs their standard of quality seems to be more wavy than consistent.

8.5 is by no means a bad score, but it reminds me of the Game Informer review of Killzone 2 where they gave it a similar score. But the things that they didn't like about the game I didn't mind so I would have scored the game higher.

I mean everyone keeps bringing up how it's scored lower than Forza 3, but two different reviews reviewed these games. You can't expect them to have the exact same likes and dislikes.

It seems like a solid game though. I'm glad to hear that since I was so disappointed in GTPSP.

EDIT: I see what your saying but I don't think this review has changed any minds. Forza 3 is not a great game, at least as a simulator.

GT5 seems to deliver exactly what GT fans want, and to complain about presentation in a GT game seems like a cop out. We have all seen the menus and cut scenes in this game and they are stunning.

OhMyGandhi4891d ago

not my kind of game, but honestly. I thought the review was well written? by grammar standards, and his thought process, this guy wasn't an "idiot", he gave what he felt the game deserved as far as score.

It's like being the person on the freeway, and that people who are driving slower than you are considered "idiots" while people who drive faster are "maniacs".

It's a reviewer from a site.
like the game? buy the game.

It's been that way since the start.
Black Ops was a good example of a game that I highly enjoy, even though certain aspects bug the crap out of me.

The reviewer isn't god. He isn't the president.

and for some reason, people are confused about the "10/10 simulator in a 5/10 game" as if it's simply illogical, and nonsensical.

He means that the core gameplay is that: simulating the driving of a car to be as close a possible to the real thing. But lacking certain features that would otherwise make it more "fleshed out".

similar to a game that has no multiplayer, or a game that has no well defined career or objective as to why the player should continue to devote his/her time to master it.

It's a game that does what it does well...But after such a long time in development, most figure there would be more on the plate.

Another good example would be...Call Of Duty. The series hasn't changed the "feel" of moving about in 60 fps (most of the time anyways) and killing others. It's distinctive, and fun. Graphics/stories and such change. but the basic mechanic of shooting is solid.

If the next Call of Duty Title has little more than a rehash of the multiplayer from it's previous titles, I'd consider it to be what this reviewer says of Grand Turismo 5: a game with rock solid base mechanic but nothing beyond that.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4891d ago
deadreckoning6664892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

"Looks like Forza holds the crown this generation."

Because IGN says so? I wasn't aware that ONE IGN journalist determines what the best racing sim of this generation is.

NEVERTHELESS...if your the type of person who takes amusement in the fanboy war...this is pretty hilarious. So much trash talk about Forza on this site...yet the most popular video game review site on the net gives GT5 a lower score on Forza 3. You don't have to be a fanboy to admit that the irony here is lol worthy.

Anton Chigurh4892d ago

I guess it's time to appreciate Forza 3.

LastDance4892d ago

He actually said Gran Turismo is the best racing sim..Watch the video review.

Motorola4892d ago

Just because GIN gave forza a higher score doesnt mean its better. Destructoid gave both a 10. So they are just as good as each other in the site's opinion.

tawak4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

they dont even make a video review because they are shame to show their face its because they get paid for the review ign is part of xbox live oxm report,strategize,achievement guide..and more..they should remove other console from the site and change the name but they did not because it gonna be lame as fvck

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4892d ago
MAJ0R4892d ago

wow didn't expect that lol

not sure whats wrong with the game though, guess I'll have to read the review

GRRiMREEAPeR4892d ago ShowReplies(3)
sack_boi4892d ago Show
cyber_crysis4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

I am still only renting GT5. No interior view, cant change wheels, lower quality detail, and only cosmetic damage on 80% of the cars is just insulting after 6 years of development. I put GT5 on my christmas list and will have it by christmas but as a huge GT fan, this is just insulting after all 6 years in development. I simply cant justify paying for a game that is only 20% complete. Maybe my mind will change when I rent it, but I highly doubt it.

4892d ago
DigitalAnalog4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

It's already widely predicted by GT5 fans that this was already the case that reviews would not be satisfactory. However, reading the content IGN brought to the table, it is 10/10 simulator.

AND THAT my friends, is what this title is "supposedly" all about. This game was truly meant for the "hardcore-of-the-hardcore " and unfortunately, to cater for them means a devaluation in the "common" ground Call-of-Duty mainstream fanbase.

But that's what it is. A niche, and regardless of IGN's thoughts, they seem to nail the fact that the PHYSICS are what stands out in this game. For Driving Simulators, that is the most important part. Better a niche with an 8.5 score than a "casual" experience going 9.5!

-End of Line

Biggest4892d ago

I noticed some of the websites listing "Too hard for casuals" as a con. It's like saying there was too much jumping in Mario. It is what it is. Can it be bad because of that?

jack_burt0n4892d ago

Put it into perspective of worthlessness for FFS.

Sonic Freeriders on kinect: 7.5

GT5: 8.5

I rest my case.

ambientFLIER4892d ago

jack burton - too bad that game scores can't be compared between different platforms...

Pandemic4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

People have been waiting 6 years for a 8.5.......?

redsquad4892d ago

No, the TROLLS have been waiting for an 8.5 - Fans of the genre have got what they expected.

callahan094892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

These critics are reviewing the game with the wait in mind. If this game were announced at E3 this year and released today, and it was exactly the same in every possible way, it would have gotten 9.5's and 10's instead. It's more obvious than anything in the world right now that this game's reviews are getting knocked down by over-criticism because they want to look at it in terms of how long it took and not in terms of WHAT IT IS.

Odin7774892d ago

No people have been waiting 6 years for a game, not a fucking review score. All these reviews are going to be less than perfect, that's what happens when people hype something up to an unattainable standard.

AceofStaves4892d ago

No. People have been waiting 5 years for a new GT game.

Gamers don't wait for scores. We play games, don't we? Or are scores that much more enjoyable?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4892d ago
GamerPS3604892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

I bought g25 2 yrs ago to play this game. WTF happened. I mean, it's not even 9. Normally, I don't care for reviews that much but GT5 was hyped to break record.
Nevertheless, I will be getting this game in few hours and judge myself but reviews are kinda disappointing.

Before you guys call me fanboi or whatever
I will be looking into physics, cars and tracks than other fancy stuff. Lets see, how that rolls out. I dont even play other racing game because I dont want to mess with my GT skill with arcade type driving games.

Well, Anti Fanboy and Fanboy got something to discuss about ;).

vhero4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

Hmm The scores a bit off 9/10 for graphics?? How so they say the game looks better than real life yet don't give 10/10.. This is the same site that gave GTA 10/10 remember? But what killed the review score is presentation nothing more.. So if you really are gonna say Forza is better because of the HUD you really need your head checking.. Thing also is I bet it will still sell a crap load more than Alan Wake and it got a lower score than it from IGN as review scores these days mean nothing.. Black Ops got under a 9 from IGN in fact GT5 is getting the Meta score as Black Ops.. Is Black Ops a flop??

4892d ago
trancefreak4892d ago

I just bought this game this evening and it freaking epic. We already know the review parade against sony this gen so I dont give a ratz azz no more.

I just bought an amzing masterpiece and Im having loads of fun. The ones that seem to care here are the ones love the demise of ps3 exclusives (very sad) and to whom ever really were going to get the game. Do it, its worth it, It looks impressive, it feels impressive. My wife saw the game and said omg that looks incredible what is it.

At least my experience so far hasnt left me dancing my car with the front bumper vertically down the track.

This game rocks. Screw the reviews and btw you can jump right in to arcade mode a take the top cars for a spin.

4892d ago
JANF4892d ago ShowReplies(2)
BrianB4892d ago ShowReplies(2)
FACTUAL evidence4892d ago

Guess this game has too much variety for IGNorant.

URIELXIV4892d ago ShowReplies(1)
PeterGriffinSays4892d ago ShowReplies(1)
LastDance4892d ago

DID ANYONE actually watch the VIDEO REVIEW...He says it plain, "gran turismo is the best driving sim on console by some marchin"

TROLL EATER4892d ago Show
MariaHelFutura4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

Forza 3 and GT5 got the same score in graphics.

Seems a tad bias to me. Regardless, I`m off to get GT5, in a few minutes.

likedamaster4892d ago

Well, Forza 3 has same graphics across the board with cockpit view for every car, while GT5's graphics are only great on the premium models(200+) & cockpit views.

ambientFLIER4892d ago

Sigh...apparently people STILL don't fucking get it. A 9.0 in graphics for an Xbox game and a 9.0 in graphics for a PS3 game ARE NOT THE SAME THING.

Chimerhazzard4892d ago

In 0:52 sec - "First the good news. This is the best driving sim avaiable for consoles, and by some margin."

Forza 3 - 9.4

GT5 - 8.5

WTF IGN :\

ambientFLIER4892d ago

For the millionth time, THE SCORES ARE NOT CROSS PLATFORM !!!!! if they were, the wii, the ds, and the psp games could never get any higher scores than xbox and ps3 games.

EVILDEAD3604892d ago

If you would have asked me for the last five years what game was going to have a 10.0 Metacritic; I would have repeatedly told you GT5..

No matter how you cut it, the 5 year wait turned out to be a negative instead of a positive for GT5. As time passes by, expectation rise tremendously (Ask the developers of Alan Wake and Final Fantasy XIII)

I made a comment thatafter all of these years, a billion screen shots and a million hours of replay footage released, Gran Turismo 5 better drive you home after you pick up your pre-order

No matter how you cut it, the ommision of a cockpit from a major portion of the cars will end up being the achilles heel of the historic franchise.

I absolutely loved Forza 3. The quality of that game after a 2-year turn-around was no small feat.

But, I still can't wait to wrap my hands around this beast.IGNs review definately is significant and as expected going to have many of the Sony elitists in an uproar, but what crazy is hearing what's coming from PSM..my thoughts are if Official Playstation Magazine still awards Gran Turismo the big '10' review then long time fans should be fine..

As for me, I'm still shopping for a good wheel because I this will be the game that is played out of my PS3 Slim for a looong time time to come.

Fans celebrate..GT5 is finally here and it's going nowhere any time soon

Evil

The Maxx4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

I was saying to expect these kinds of reviews simply because of the limitations that GT5 offers in the game like:

segmented car classes (premium and standard)
No cockpit view for all cars
no proper tuning
lack of damage
lack of modding and customization

I said that every review will be looking and comparing the features in GT5 and how they related to what is already on the market and that lack of CORE features and I lost 2 bubbles because if it. And now, the Meta is 86% and why? Because of the very elements that I stated. CORE features not being present in the game that is expected at this stage of gaming in this era.

EVILDEAD3604892d ago

I'm really not the type to nit pick PDs decision making progress on what didn't make the cut because as a developer they are as passionate as it gets..

But, I think they could have staved off much of the criticism if they just told their fans in advance about the cockpit view only for premiums.

The ironic thing is many people don't even play GT5 from cockpit 100% of the time..

Personally it just means I need to step my game up and get to those premium cars because I'm sure the premium game play should be outstanding..

Don't agree that someone should lose bubz for pointing out the truth (+bubz) from me...

Again for me..it come down to what IS in the game..and I am still ridiculously excited to play

PDz take on Nascar
The Weather Effects
The Night racing
The Rally racing

So honestly at this point I can't see an 8.5 IGN rating stopping me from picking up my pre-order..

Evil

newflesh4892d ago

I'm actually starting to gain some long lost respect for IGN.

new vegas-8.5 (fair score)
black ops-8.5 (unbelieveble from ign)
Asassin's Creed:Brotherhood - 8! (lower than all big sites)

And now GT5 an 8.5. It's just so untypical of ign to score such big games so low. Maybe they stopped taking bribes..

Chaos Striker4892d ago

They were actually very far from the beginning. It was only because IGN gave Lair, Heavenly Sword, and Warhawk bad reviews that ...fanboys... started going berserk and paranoid. To me, IGN is very fair with almost all of their games (yes there is about 5% that are questionable, but overall, they have spot on reviews). They grade on an overall experience not just the sum of a game's parts. They take into account different perspectives such as the hardcore fan, the casual gamer, and the gamer that wants to enter this genre.

Also, their staff is hilariously awesome. PS3 fans(and fanboys) should listen to Podcast Beyond, because it is so hilarious and informative at the same time. The folks that do the podcast are primary PS3 fanboys, but have respect for stuff like Mass Effect 2 (when it was an exclusive).

Ace Killa 084892d ago

U honestly think lair was a good game?

Chaos Striker4892d ago

I don't think it's a good game (I don't know how you thought I thought it is a good game to be honest) But a lot of people on this site seemed to think so, although reviewers universally panned the game.

Anon19744892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

To put this in perspective, the metacritic score for GT4 was 89 and it was a monster success (IGN scored that one a 95, in case you were wondering). I expect that GT5 will received a similar score once all the votes are in. Now, is the fact that it's received an 8.5, an excellent score from IGN, instead of a 9 really going to deter racing fans from picking up this title? I'm guessing not.

IGN concluded that it's a fantastic racing game marred by a menu system that came up short. For me the menu system could have consisted of "Pick car. Click here to race" and if it delivered 10/10 on the track like IGN says it does, that's all that matters.

likedamaster4892d ago

Interesting... never heard you comment like this before.
Anywho, play the game for a decent 5 hours or so before you express your take on it.

4892d ago Replies(2)
Zydake4892d ago

this may be off topic but..

who the hell said there HDD install was 45 mins long
just got my GT5 via amazon and i just started my recommended install and I got 15 minutes

Hoggy19834892d ago

Maybe depends on your connection? I only get 2m until fibre is installed at christmas! (UK)

Hoggy19834892d ago

Forget that comment its local!

kudakadere4892d ago

GT5 8.5 Forza 9.4 forza gets a 9.4 becuse it took only 2years to develope and plan GT5 minus the delays = a 9.8 at minimum ,*sigh* only if polyphony knew that no one would critisise a patch of grass thats sightly out of place.

Hoggy19834892d ago

As a new PS3 owner I bought my copy at lunch but, considering im not normally a massive fan of racers, Im a little bit apprehensive about the purchase now. Im not really bothered about customisation but am looking forward to some 16 player online races.
The main thing that concerns me is the reference to the AI being erratic causing "bumper cars" and winning races being based on the machine rather than ability of the driver.

However, Im off to play it and I'll be able to form my own opinion!

INehalemEXI4892d ago (Edited 4892d ago )

They gave Prologue an 8.5 .....I'm confused. How does a full game get the same score....

I question a review system where you look back years from now and want to see what sim to get , and your led to believe GT5P=/=GT5

ambientFLIER4892d ago

Because obviously they felt that an additional 3 years of development time should have made gt5 better than it is versus prologue.

Pika-pie4892d ago

Very suprised with the review score. Was expecting much higher praise for this game.

Decided to hold off on purchasing this game until it comes down in price. Spent the money on a bottle of Champagne instead hehehehe

Bubble Buddy4892d ago

The guy writing the article has a grammar mistake in the first sentence.

"Its" not It's".

smh

darkziosj4892d ago Show
showtimefolks4892d ago

is uncall for. forza and GT5 are great games how is that and leave it to that

pixelsword4891d ago (Edited 4891d ago )

Yeah, I wouldn't kick Forza because it was a great game, and so it GT5.

AEtherbane4891d ago

I'm sorry IGN, not every game can have killstreaks and red-dot sights

TripleAAARating4891d ago

This game exceeds my standards as far as I'm concerned.....

internalbit4891d ago

I have said it b4 and I will say it again. IGN is one if Microsoft many marketing departments. Sony could make ps3 into a time machine with a firmware update, they will find a reason to critics it.

+ Show (35) more repliesLast reply 4891d ago
4892d ago Replies(3)
PirateThom4892d ago

IGN gave an 8.5.

Funny enough, 9 for gameplay and lasting appeal.

Omega44892d ago

And there you have it. Solid game but not AAA.

Chris3994892d ago ShowReplies(5)
tatotiburon4892d ago ShowReplies(1)
Playerz84892d ago

Damn, who ever posted this review is freaking fast. I thought I was gonna post it =( Anyway, I expected better of GT5, but I'm still gonna get it.

Show all comments (332)
90°

PlayStation 3: chasing the 1080p dream, part three - Gran Turismo 5 and the indie explosion

From Digital Foundry: "Welcome to the third part in the biggest DF Retro episode we've ever produced - a year-by-year look at how 1080p gaming fared on the PlayStation 3. Launched in 2007 touting its then-exclusive HDMI digital interface, Sony layered full HD gaming on top of its Cell processor and RSX 'Reality Synthesizer' as key selling points for its third generation console. Of course, we all know how that turned out - both Sony and Microsoft machines routinely ran the most advanced titles at sub-720p resolutions, often with questionable performance, so what happened to the 1080p dream?

In the first two parts of John Linneman's investigation, we've covered off the first four years of the Triple's lifecycle and moving into 2010, the overall fortunes of the PlayStation 3 continued to improve. The platform holder released - what was then - the most advanced motion controller in the console space, backed up by experiments with stereoscopic 3D, which turned out to be a short-lived but still formidable pairing. Combined with a strong E3 showing, PS3 was looking good.

However, it's fair to say that it was a fallow year for 1080p gaming on the system, with only Scott Pilgrim Saves The World's razor-sharp pixel art upscaling, Castle Crashers and Soldner X2's 3D/FMV stylings accommodating full HD output - alongside a wonderful Monkey Island remaster."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ApocalypseShadow631d ago (Edited 631d ago )

Just remember ladies and gentlemen, Sony never said all games would be 1080p. Only that the system would support games up to 1080p in a survey before the system was released.
https://spong.com/article/9...
And as we saw, some games did support it, some games tried their best to support it and some games didn't or never reached it.

Is a higher resolution great to have if you can do it? Sure. Is it necessary for a fun game? No

But what I find interesting is Eurogamer. Are they really talking about HD and PS3 in their article or are they really pushing their 4.50 Euros 4K video download subscription? Seems one is being used to sell the other. Just look at the bottom of the article.

Michiel1989631d ago

thats what every company tries to do, push for people to buy their products. Are you really gonna blame them for that?

ApocalypseShadow630d ago

Not all articles are about selling. They're about informing or entertaining.

Maybe I'm supposed to watch the video instead of reading. But I shouldn't have to click. But the article lazily tells us some games did hit 1080p and some didn't. I didn't learn anything new as I own the console. Then, they push a Patreon subscription.

Are you saying every opinion, preview, review and rant article requires a push to buy something now? Tell me which sites are prone to do so so that I can avoid them in the future.

Michiel1989630d ago

not everyone played during the ps3 era. I started during snes era but loved seeing articles/videos about how gaming evolved before that.

i dont think this article is trying to push you to get that patreon sub, it doesnt for me at least. I dont think theres anything wrong putting an ad at the bottom of the article. all the regular DF videos are free already.

SonyStyled631d ago

Wipeout HD on PS3, a remake of the PS1 game was 1080p 60fps. And that released in 2007-08

Christopher631d ago

This really feels like a filler article. I don't feel like I learned anything notable or substantial from this. I feel they could have reduced the unnecessary intro and over-explanation of things and put the whole series in one article for a more substantial and possibly informative piece rather than piece-mealing it out as they have.

dumahim631d ago

It's more about the video. DF Retro videos are for Patreon members first, and I think the whole thing was one big video. For the youtube channel, it gets chopped up and released weekly.

ApocalypseShadow630d ago

Chris is actually right on this one. Something known already was just kind of washed over in the article. Unless you're supposed to get more in the video. If more is in the video, then more could have been said in the article.

Only thing I learned new was that they are selling a subscription. My point though is that you gain more viewers by having better articles and content.

628d ago
280°

What Happened To Gran Turismo?

When thinking about simulation racing games in this console generation, it’s not unreasonable for your first thought to be “Forza”. Microsoft’s first-party sim-racer series has been wildly successful, and for many of us, it’s been the go-to franchise for quite some time. But simulation racing games weren’t always synonymous with Forza; there was a time when Polyphony Digital’s hardcore series, Gran Turismo, reigned supreme. While the long-time franchise continues to sell exceptionally well, there’s no doubt that it isn’t the young, spry series it used to be.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
darthv721698d ago

It doesnt suck but I would love to see a return to form with GT7. Sport is such a departure that it can turn some people off. It has gotten better over time but it's still no match for a proper GT7.

Rude-ro1697d ago

Sport is awesome for what it is...
However, polygon built a whole new engine and the tech is still being worked on...
I understand it is easy to praise a cookie cutter because it release the same game over and over with rotations of maps and cars...
But this engine polygon has designed does more for things other than gaming.

Repetitive old engines with new makeup does not make anyone king.

Gt7 will be most likely in two years with 120fps and ray tracing because their new engines are ready now.

LordStig1698d ago

It decided to focus on racing rather than cars and in the gaming world, racing = gameplay.

Imalwaysright1697d ago

What complete and utter BS. GT has always focused on racing and gameplay.

1698d ago
neutralgamer19921697d ago

Good I guess selling millions of copies and have OFFICIAL FIA license races and Esports means it sucks

We just don't get it every year which is why ms also delayed next forza. You can't keep making yearly sequels. Quality and innovation takes time

GT sports at launch to now it's a different game and support has been free

Imalwaysright1697d ago

GT games have always sold millions of copies and what's so innovative about GT sport? It's a racing game FFS.

IRetrouk1697d ago

The online championships and tournaments alone offer more innovation than any racer this gen🤷‍♂️ then you also get the live ones in New York etc with proper race like commentary, something else no other sim has done before. It sells millions because it's the best, simple really.

Imalwaysright1697d ago (Edited 1697d ago )

IRetrouk

I'm not even sure why think that having proper like race commentary or championships and tournements is innovative but I'll play along... GT Sport was released in 2017 so how do explain that this video https://www.youtube.com/wat... from 2016 exists?

Dark_Knightmare21697d ago

Spoken like someone who hasn’t played sport

Imortus_san1696d ago

And those Paid demos, that fans try to hide and not talk about it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1696d ago
SCW19821698d ago

It became the best online racing community for console players and its an amazing achievment.

Keltech1698d ago

"Forza?" HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!! good joke!

kayoss1698d ago

Too early for an Aprils fool joke.

1698d ago
ElementX1697d ago

@solidgamerX That's really not very impressive. Somebody with an interest in cars plays racing games and becomes a race car driver. That's like saying "look at this guy, he played COD and now he's in the military"

Imalwaysright1697d ago

SolidGamerX

You must think that we're all stupid enough to believe that a game will turn anyone into a professional racing driver.

Prince-Ali1697d ago

FORZA!!! AAHAHHAHA !! Haven't i schooled you on this already before! You're still spewing nonsense on this threaddd looool

mcstorm1697d ago

Forza has always been better online than. GT and still is. Great to see PD try something different with GTS but let's face it this gen sonys racing games have been poor this then compaired to what Microsoft has had to offer. Forza 7 is one of the best racing games on xbox and pc but for me Horizon 3 and 4 have set the bar this gen. Of all the things microsoft got wrong this gen 2 of its racing games got a lot right and others are now playing catchup.

DarXyde1697d ago

It's debatable which is the better game. To me, Forza has the upper hand.

But in terms of online community and events? Ha. Don't lie to yourself just because you don't like Playstation.

1697d ago
1697d ago
Dark_Knightmare21697d ago

Lol not even close have you even played gt sport online?

Imalwaysright1697d ago (Edited 1697d ago )

SolidGamerX

You didn't need to confirm what I already knew: if you didn't think that we're all stupid you wouldn't make such stupid comments that only those that are dead from the neck up will agree with.

IRetrouk1697d ago (Edited 1697d ago )

Did he say gt could turn anyone into a racer? No he didnt, he asked what game has done it like gt has, which is true, gt academy done it throughout gt5 for a start. You need to do some research fella, cause your wrong.. again.

And lmao at element and the downplay, not even similar you crazy man, not even similar🤣 you realise gt has turned gamers into drivers from gt5? Go look at gt academy and tell me how that would be anything like someone playing cod and then joining the army, the downplay in gt articles is funny.

ElementX1697d ago

So you think he learned the required skills playing video games? I remember when people claimed children were learning how to operate guns because of video games, do you think that's also true?

IRetrouk1697d ago (Edited 1697d ago )

Two completely different things and you know it, it is a fact that gt has helped real gamers become real race drivers, the proof is easily available online and I'm not going round searching for links that has been posted many, many times before on this subject, Go and look at gt academy like I mentioned and you can see for yourself, they start out on gt and go from there, so yes the game gran turismo teaches you some driving techniques, now if you can find me a link where someone has been playing cod and went on to become a war hero, please let me know because I couldnt find anything, also do you have a link to where cod has a program to train soldiers? Like cod academy or something?, I couldnt find one of those either, maybe when you do then your comparison will actually make sense.

Imalwaysright1697d ago

IRetrouk

You mean the GT academy that provides training and licenses for a person to become a professional racing driver? The GT academy is how you go from being an average driving joe to become a professional racing driver not GT the game.

1697d ago
+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 1697d ago
1697d ago
xRacer74x1698d ago

Forza owns the racing game scene in my area as far as video games go.

dekke1698d ago

Forza = Arcade
GT= Sim

why u ppl keep comparing those 2 games every time..

Keltech1698d ago (Edited 1698d ago )

GT owns the console sim racing scene in my area and around the world. Just ask a real race car drivers

https://youtu.be/2pC3-eCAdv...

LordStig1698d ago

Forza isn't a racing game. It's a car game.

1698d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1698d ago
Hungryalpaca1697d ago

I’ll stick to sims. You keep playing with your hot wheels.

King_Noctis1697d ago

You forget that there are two Forzas, Forza Motorsport and Forza Horizon, which aims at different audiences.

King Nezz1697d ago

The usual response from someone insecure that feels their favorite racing game is nowhere near as good as it once was. I really liked Gran and played them all. Loved the Vector from part 2. But the franchise is not the same.

Gaming4Life19811697d ago

Yea Forza took over and is now the best sim racer with motorsport and the best arcade racer with horizon. GT was the best but it has been falling short for a long time and I'm not saying gt games are bad but no where near king like it used to be. I'd say forza motorsport 3 was the forza that really upped the franchise and forza 4 was when forza became #1.

I remember the glory days of gt but those days are long gone but it's still a good game just not the best. Of course ps fans will never admit it because they will die before giving MS credit.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1697d ago
Nacho_Z1698d ago

I do think they need some new creative heads in to give them some new perspectives, they seem stuck in a rut. It's a very high quality rut but they're still stuck in it.

LordStig1698d ago

The USA leg of the Gran Turismo World Tour is going on in New York right now. Go watch it guys, there's some damn good racing and crazy updates to come.

Nacho_Z1697d ago

I've seen some of it before and to be fair it's not much different to watching real motorsport so credit to them for that.

Heavenly King1698d ago

the MACH 5 :) GO SPEED rACEr!!

Show all comments (108)
320°

Gran Turismo 5, Gran Turismo 6, Wipeout HD, God of War 3 and more running on PC via the latest RPCS3

DSOGaming writes: "It appears that the best Playstation 3 emulator that is currently under development, RPCS3, received a new update recently. kd-11 has implemented new Surface Cache fixes to RPCS3 that reportedly improve the appearance of car reflections in Gran Turismo 6, and fix various graphics glitches in other games."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
1735d ago Replies(6)
gangsta_red1735d ago

If someone out there in internet land could make a decent PS3 emulator imagine what Sony could actually do if they put the time and effort in to make this happen for their next console?

It's definitely not impossible as we can see here. It should definitely be done since BC seems to be very important to Sony this next gen. Imagine PS+ free game offerings from Sony that could include the whole catalog from the PS console family..fantastic.

Silly gameAr1735d ago

Why waste time and money on it? Some people want to move forward, not go back.

Eonjay1735d ago

It's not a deal breaker but having the feature would be amazing. I would rather have it than not have it.

gangsta_red1735d ago

Not everyone feels that way and if Sony is making an issue of supporting PS4 games for PS5 why not support their other past games for people who still have them or a means to buy them and play them.

KwietStorm_BLM1735d ago

You literally just said some people. So I'd imagine you can comprehend that there's a larger subset of people not in that same "some" group. PlayStation used to be known for backward compatibility. Xbox made a big deal about support for their entire catalog. What's the issue with PlayStation, who has an even more substantial history in gaming, tapping into that market? We don't have this problem on PC. It's only a good thing for consumers to be able to bring their games with them through generations on console.

Silly gameAr1734d ago (Edited 1734d ago )

@kwietstorm

Yes, I said some people. What I said was MY opinion. I'm one of those people that couldn't care less about bc, but im not saying ALL people don't care about it. I think they should spend that time and energy for future features and games, but like I said, that's only my opinion.

Imortus_san1734d ago (Edited 1734d ago )

Not every body trows their games way every time the new gen cames along, and everybody that likes games like to be able to play their favorite games in the best possible way.

PS: Retrocompatability is the most requested feature in Sony Foruns, even Sony said so.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1734d ago
frostypants1735d ago (Edited 1735d ago )

The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile? Are the number of additional consoles PS3 BC would push be enough to justify the cost of developing the emulation (and it would have to be bullet proof)? I like the idea of having it, but for my part not having it won't effect my purchase decision.

1735d ago
Eonjay1735d ago

You are asking the right question but the wrong way. For me, the addition of PS3 BC would add value as a customer and make it even more likely for me to buy a PS5. If it is valuable to the customer it is valuable to them.

Also, the way they are doing it would be way cheaper than a program like Microsoft had. The are emulating the hardware. Not the software.

gangsta_red1735d ago

"The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile?"

Sony could definitely make some extra profit selling PS3 games through their marketplace (the same way they have their other classics available). It's not about whether or not it will effect anyone's purchase decision, it definitely didn't do so for the PS4. But as others have expressed, it would be a nice addition to have for PS5 if Sony could open up their whole library digitally and physically to users.

ShadowWolf7121735d ago

Racing games should be some of the easiest to emulate and they're still not hitting 60fps with it, to say nothing of image flickering and occasional sound issues.

Still gonna be a bit yet before they have it fully up and running, it seems, and even then it may only work for part of the library. :/

1735d ago Replies(2)
Gwiz1735d ago

Is it possible to have PS3 emulation on PS5?yes depending on what kind of power it really has.
An i7 9700k is no slouch and the PS4 already has a God of War 3 running much better with less
power required because they converted CBE to X86 which is not something you want to be doing in the long run.

What power would be required to play these games emulated at said PS4 version?.
It's not an easy situation Sony themselves created and ultimately I believe they are happy this way because they
want you to use PSNow,that service is why you will not even get it. (let's not forget that it was a huge investment)

1735d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (45)