Vanquish 360 version is subHD 1024x720 with 2xAA

Initial analysis from the 360 demo of Vanquish reveals it's resolution.

PS3 demo will be available later today during the PS Store update.

[Dance]

its not that low of resolution to begin with

[lovemyps3]

Damn that sucks for 360 owners, either way everyone should buy the game 360 and ps3 owners, it looks great regardless.

[SuperTiger]

The PS3 version might be worse.
I hope it won't be but they're the guys who made Bayonetta so I don't expect much.

Edit

Why am I getting disagrees? :\

@MisterNiwa

Are you sure this is true? I hope it is!

[MisterNiwa]

Get your news straight.

The PS3 is the lead platform for this game. And the Team is lead by Shinji Mikami this time. He didn't do Bayonetta.

[Tricksy]

not a bad resolution in my mind as long and FPS(frames per second) is nice and, although I dont have an xbox and never will, the xbox has a reputation as a good machine for FPS's (frames persecond...as well as first person shooters i guess hehe).

If this is from the creators of Bayonetta... expect them to not know how to utilize the cell. :(

EDIT: Oh? Great news MisterNiwa. Fingers crossed this game looks stunning on the PS3.

[scofios]

@SuperTiger  
Mikami has stated that the game is being developed with the PlayStation 3 as its lead platform .
Bayonetta was developed with the xbox 360 as the lead platform . platinium games made bayonetta as an xbox exlusive , which later on became a multiplatform game due to sega who is the publisher and who did the ps3 port .
edit : for those who disagree .
Go google it up . i see some people are butt hurt use vaseline next time .

[rockleex]

Seeing as how Vanquish was made by Platinum Games on BOTH platforms to begin with, it should do pretty well on both systems.

I never really trust developers when they claim one system is the lead platform or whatever.

Just look at Ghostbusters. -_-"

[nveenio]

If the vertical resolution is 720 or above, I'm happy. Of course, I don't have a 360, so we'll see what the deal is on the PS3, I guess. I'll make my decision on the game itself, though...not a pixel count.

[Double Toasted]

Ah, no Gears of War killer here folks, move along...ha.

PS3 holding the 360 back in terms of graphics, huh? Shame really...

[wicko]

Even though the control scheme is a bit wonky (crazy japs) the game itself is awesome. Comparing this to Gears of War isn't all that fair, since this game does a hell of a lot more interesting stuff than Gears does.

[Conloles]

Lol poor consoles never in true 1080P HD :'(

[Longrod_Von_Hugendon]

DM

[jacobdevos]

lead by that guy.. but the same team as bayonetta right?

So I'm not sure he was wrong.. he said the same guys and he's right.. if you've ever worked in a programming environment you know that the guy who leads development typically doesn't even write or read the code..

PS3 is lead platform for this game though i remember an article about that.. although a couple comments on this post have been saying it's the same engine as bayonetta? that seems a bit confusing.. how could ps3 be the lead platform when its on bayonettas engine.. whos lead platform was x360?

[mastiffchild]

Conloles-do you NEVER stop? People don't all want to game on their PC even if you do. Personally, I've started gaming more on consoles this generation because I got sick of mouse and keyboard controls, feeling the need to improve my set up(not including upgrading cards etc but JUST my gaming mouse etc)all the time and finding it a bigger barrier to immersion than any resolution issues ever. I found it was TOO good, if you wil, and I was capabe of almost game breaking speed and accuracy with PC controls schemes and also found the online felt less and less of an even playing field with everyone using different control schemes, different tech and often cheating with the choices they made with console mods etc.

I'm not saying I',m right but just showing that that PC and M/K isn't first choice for everyone for many reasons. i'm miles BETTER with a mouse etc and even then find aiming on a separate plane feels too unrealistic these days(again JUST for me) and a lot of folk like the convenience of a console but you just want to look down on people for not being PC gamers and PC gamers alone. What of the console only games we all love? We should forgo them just cos you get 1080p more often? Idiocy, elitist idiocy and the kind of 'tude which splits us as a community and ensured console gamers didn't care, when they should have, when MW2 went P2P on PC and when the pirates ensured there was no proper , full featured DA2 on PC. It's possible because people like you make console gamers hate PC gamers as elitist tools.

I refused to buy Alan Wake BECAUSE they shafted PC gamers over it and if fewer PC gamers acted like you, mate, maybe more console gamers would have and Remedy would have released it on PC.

I would NEVER be witrhout my rig and love my PC gaming even if I use a pad for it where possible but fail to see just what makes you bitter with console owners when the biggest enemy for PC gamers is the rife piracy we suffer making our PC games less profitable. Moan at them not consoles FFS. Another thing-my PC monitor is only 26" and at that size I'd say no one could tell me when they were playing at 720 as opposed to 1080p anyway so your resolution talk is VERY subjective in value when most monitors are even smaller than mine!!

Tell u wot-play some games. might make you a bit calmer rather than trolling console threads advertising the fact you like PC best. Both have their places.

[Scrooge]

Yeah, how will I ever enjoy this game when it's missing a few pixels per square inch?

[tplarkin7]

Anything less than 720p is "subHD". Like it or not, 720p is standard HD for games this gen.

[sikbeta]

@SuperTiger

They didn't, Sega dealt with the Port, Platinum got nothing to do with the port and this time Shinji Mikami is working on this game, so hopefully, there will be no problems for the PS3 version...

@Double Toasted

Hmmm... I don't know pal, something tells me it's going to be like FF13 disaster all over again....

[Vivi]

Still not a good thing. The faint blurriness will be noticeable. For such a fast paced game I hope the PS3 version is a crisp and clean 720P but I doubt it :(

Funny how different the tech is from Bayonetta

Bayonetta 360
60FPS
720P

Vanquish 360 (using a highly upgraded Bayonetta Engine)
30FPS
Sub-HD

[dosgrtr]

so it is 30

[Christopher]

There's a ton more happening in this game than Bayonetta. I can see why the downgrade for both physics and maintaining a certain framerate.

Not that I wouldn't want more, but can see why it resulted in a downgrade of this sort.

As long as it's good looking (not awesome) and fun to play, I'll be happy... when I can get to playing it.

@disagreers: Aww... crap, I forgot I'm not supposed to support games, I'm supposed to chose to support 360 or PS3 and bash the other. My bad *rolls eyes*

[raztad]

@cgoodno

Sorry about those undeserved disagrees. You, as always, make sense and some people dont like it.

Let me support your point, and this is something people seems to forget frequently when talking about graphics. Vanquish looks to have a lot more stuff going on on screen, + stuff under the hood, like collision detection, AI, physics, that werent in Bayonetta.

I'm totally surprised game is not 60fps but achieve to feel look very fast paced. Probably is just a very smart use of motion blur.

[MorganX]

Just tried the demo. Lots of potential. Gears cover system feels tighter. Better than I thought it would be but, noticeably blurry. Unacceptably blurry.

[StanLee]

Did you play Bayonetta? There is certainly not more going on on screen that in Bayonetta. I wonder if fanboys will say now the PS3 gimped the XBox 360 version because that is exactly what happened.

[totallysane]

what does it matter. the game looks good and is fun to play for now. get over the goddam graphics will you people

[mastiffchild]

Stanlee-you're being daft. The 360 version of Bayonetta was complete before a PS3 version was even started. Talk with a bit more sense-if Bayonetta was better looking than GOW3 then, even with the above reasoning, you might have a point but as there are better games on both consoles I have NO idea what you mean by anything being "gimped" other than if they downplayed BOTH versions late in the day to ensure "parity" this generations multiplat cancer.

Seriously, if the PS3 was gimping 360 versions of anything where are the exclusives to prove what you speak of? Where are the 360 games that eclipse Uncharted1, let alone U2, GOW or KZ2?

[iPad]

Why are people worried about the PS3 version? The PS3 is the lead performer of this game. Therefore, the PS3 version is superior.

[Biggest]

That remains to be seen. Either way, the game does look like a blast to play and the acting seems horrible in the very entertaining way. Should be good all around.

[bjornbear]

PS3 was the lead platform for ghost busters...and look what happened.

I could care less. This is more important for fanboys than for real gamers (exception of Multi-console owners who will simply buy the better version and care less about commenting on it)

regardless, this game and Lord Of Shadow are both proving to be the multi-plat heavy hitters of this Q3 =D

this, Lord of shadow, GT5 and LBP2 are the 4 games on my radar for this xmas (way too many for my budget =()

[meetajhu]

i disagree with you because u have Ipad as a ur name!

[FACTUAL evidence]

Alan wake says hello....5 years in development sub HD /S sorry had to go there.

[milohighclub]

get that shit bitch...

[EvilBlackCat]

the anti 360 continues

[lokiroo420]

And it begins, any word on ps3 version?

[jay2]

Nothing on the PS3 virsions, but this downgrade is a bit worrying....

[jizzyjones]

PS3 is lead platform, jus like 360 was lead on Beyonetta, so this time the PS3 version will be "superior".

[Tuxedoassassin]

The PS3 is lead praform for this game, so itˇs hard to guess, but we see more later.

[ALFAxD_CENTAURO]

Yes, is announced from the Developers:
http://n4g.com/news/493104/...

[DaThreats]

Turn for the best multi-platform

[yourfather]

PS3 version
http://pds19.egloos.com/pds...

[Hallmark Moment]

So much for PS3 fans gearing up to bash. I see people talking Lead platform this! Bayonetta that!

This game is doing much more than Bayonetta when it comes to processing.

[nycredude]

That precisely is the reason this is a step down from a tech perspective from Bayoneta. Obviously with the increase things going on screen and the physics calculation, the 360 is been pushed more and so concessions had to be made to keep it playable without frame rate dropping. We'll see if this is also a case on the Ps3 shortly tonight.

I know Hallmark that you don't like the truth but this seems like a case of cold hard truths.

Then again it could be just the demo version is outdated code and both versions will be fine when released.

[solidjun5]

It looks really fun and I'm going to buy it Day 1. Besides, that's just the demo and until can tell me the full retail game will be sub-HD, then this news shouldn't be much of an issue. It should really be that big of an issue at all cause from those videos (i'm downloading it tonight on PSN), this game kicks arse. Can't wait to play it.

[BeaArthur]

I thought we played games, not watched them.

[Unicron]

Again with the logic. This is a day 1 buy for me, so is Enslaved, Castlevania, and Force 2.

Booyah, October wallet rape!

[solidjun5]

My wallet is going to bring a suit against me in Federal court for the amount of money i'm spending this winter.

bubble for both of you. I hope this board don't turn into a big argument. Err...where am I again?

[BeaArthur]

I'll probably go for a Christmas present. No MP means it's the same experience no matter when I pick it up.

[LiquifiedArt]

is point less right? Or buying a next-gen games console right?

Your point is moot. Graphics do matter and Sub-HD is really unacceptable at this stage in the generation.

[asyouburn]

dude the gaem is 1024x720. you act like it just displays blank screen when you turn it on. the rez is higher than say, 576p (alan Wake) or 600p (COD) or 640p (halo 3) its higher than all of those, but yet all those games look great on hdtv's. so tell me again how this is a big deal.

[ElementX]

MGS4 says hello...

/sarcasm (had to go there)

[Convas]

Shhhhh, Bea, this is N4G! We play graphics not games! Get with the program!

/Sarcasm

[nycredude]

Technically we play AND watch games, unless you play with your eyes closed. :P

[mrmikew2018]

We have to thank our retarded friends at Neogaf, LoT and Digital Foundry for starting this epidemic of stupidity. No one plays games anymore, they rather watch a screenshot and argue for countless hours over pixels and resolutions. So I would like to thank the fanbo....I mean the professionals on these sites.

P.S.

The demo is freaking insane!!

[mastiffchild]

Yep. When the multis aim for parity rather than all out quality on the visual front it DOES seem a bit much comparing every sodding pixel to the point we use programs to find tiny differences. Compare higher end exclusives for an idea but not multis with the express need to sell across multiple systems and therefore not wanting to upaet anyone with a big gap and as the cheapest way of working is closer to the 360's best area(though still not great for it when PS3 and 360 weaknesses rather than strengths are what govern the results)it's often the PS3 that has to do without something or other but it's never enough to make me want to change from the console with my preferred pad-a much bigger concern than a second longer loading or whatever. too much fuss about games that aren't even TRYING to prove themselves powerhouses technically.

neither version gimps the other as both could be better in 99.9% of cases and the curse of having two similar sized user bases means we're damned to them trying to reach near parity and not pushing any system.

[lovemyps3]

since the ps3 is the lead platform chances are its going to be the best version.

[UnBrEaKaBLEe]

whats so hard for people to understand? its being made on the playstation 3 and ported to the 360.

[ALFAxD_CENTAURO]

Yes, PS3 is the lead Platform.

http://n4g.com/news/493104/...

[Mista T]

whats the big deal with this. 1024 x 720 with 2xAA is better than a lot of console games

[CobraKai]

At least it's not 640p or 546p. I think this is acceptable and unlike the resolutions I mentioned, it shouldn't be that noticeable.

[CernaML]

Yeah, and we're definitely not talking about FFXIII on the 360. LOL

[Scotland-The-Brave]

Hahaha! you got owned

[k-Lan]

Scotland? Owned?? lmao! What was the better game of the two mentionned? Thank you.

[smashman98]

are we talking about mass effect coming to ps3

[asyouburn]

that red dead on PS3 ran at a higher resolution than COD MW2. so now tell me how ugly modern warfare was, and how its unplayable at 600p

[asyouburn]

you can make the versions identical by messing with settings on your tv. both versions run at 600p on consoles. my point is the pc version wipes the floor with the 360 version, so anyway you look at it, the 360 version is just another inferior port, just like most of the multiplats on 360

[asyouburn]

if you dont count pc and 360, that ps3 is best version around. the diffrences between ps3 and xbox mw2 are very minimal compared to pc version. it makes no sense to say if you omit version A, then version b is better than version c. you might as well be playin the ps3 version compared to pc. if were gonna talk multi plat games why leave best version out? from my own comparison (i.e. not one i read online) both are damn near identical. the framerate isnt as different as you portray it.
Edit. the point i was trying to make about red dead on ps3 was that it runs a higher rez than both console versions of MW, and a gazillion people play and love the game on both. not that thats the one i play personally, just using it as an example of a popular game
EDIT2 its funny that 2 out of the 3 lens of truthers chose ps3 version

[CernaML]

Yeah, and we're not talking about the 10 out of 10 PS3 exclusive games that look, perform, and play better than any 360 exclusive out there. :P

Bu-bu-bu teh multiplats make 90% of teh library!

Funny cause most of my collection consists of exclusives anyway. :)

...But that's beside the point right? :P

[Sharingan_no_Kakashi]

1080x720 is true HD right? Doesnt seem that bad.

Winter's gonna kill my wallet. I'm actually debating between this and Enslaved.

[zatrox]

Actually, to consider it "HD", it's gotta be 1080x768.

Even so, the difference between those are highly minimal, plus, the 360 upscales, if I'm not wrong.

In other words, this is just silly fanboys fighting over nothing. Sigh.

[OpenGL]

Native 720p is 1280x720.

[Sharingan_no_Kakashi]

Well that IS troubling.

[Motorola]

1280x720 is surprisingly small...smaller then my PC monitor.

[iamgoatman]

True HD is 1920x1080.

[CobraKai]

720p was marketed as TRUE HD and 1080p is marketed as FULL HD. I dunno if that changed now though.

[Sarcasm]

Cobra, I think it was marketed as both.

Then again, it's a wash considering they say anything with 1080 lines is "True HD" like 1280x1080

[iamgoatman]

I always thought one was just HD and the other was True/Full HD. Quite frankly I couldn't give a shit about it's specific marketed name.

[IHateYouFanboys]

"True HD" and "Full HD" are just marketing terms invented by TV companies like Sony to sell TVs. there is no such thing as 'full HD' in technical terms, nor 'true HD'. its either HD, or its not.

[bailoutbenny]

Anything with 720 horizontal scan lines progressively refreshed is 720p. Anything with 1080 horizontal scan lines progressively refreshed is 1080p.

Aspect ratio (4:3 vs. 16:9 vs. a custom aspect ratio) is what controls the number of pixels per scan line.

4:3 (1.33:1) at 720p = 958 (957 if rounding down) pixels per scan line.
16:9 (1.78:1) at 720p = 1282 (1281 if rounding down) pixels per scan line.

This game has a 1.42:1 (similar to IMAX format, shy of 3:2) aspect ratio at 720p.

Resolution is the total number of pixels as determined by the number of scan lines and pixels per scan line.

All of this subHD vs. HD talk is marketing nonsense to confuse consumers.

Obviously better resolutions are more pleasing to the eye, as are certain aspect ratios for artistic requirements, but technical limitations also need to be considered for framerate and memory targets.

[spawn89]

they said that the ps3 is the lead platform for this game there was an article when the anouced vaquish but since they made bayonetta bad on the ps3 i don exept something god from them but i hope im wrong

[milohighclub]

bayonetta was made on the 360, then ported to the ps3. didn't any one read the stuff yesterday when the game went up, people are saying it looks the same on both consoles.

[Nicky7]

OMG you know what this means. FIGHT!!!!

[I HARLEM I]

...........................

[lucifon]

I'd imagine the PS3 version will be the same minus the AA, as 2x AA comes at no hit with the 360's GPU. Or it'd just be identical. Pretty sure it'll look decent on both platforms, they won't make the same mistake as they did with Bayonetta.

[sajj316]

Possibilities are:

- same resolution, no AA
- same resolution, quincux
- 720p or slighter higher resolution than 360 version, no AA

[k-Lan]

I'm sure the difference between the two versions will be minimal. At least it gives us something to complain about ;)

[Kroganwrex]

From what I have seen/heard, It seems that since the ps3 was the lead platform, this team wanted to avoid another media lashing over an inferior ps3 version and so both have been compromised to ensure a steady framerate on ps3 unlike on bayonetta.

IN OTHER WORDS : This development team are fucking morons and can't get it through their thick shit brains that they need help developing for the ps3, so now both version get reduced to keep em "even". Even then, the ps3 version has no AA and 360 version and 2XAA. I dont care about resolution, for me its truly the game's art style and other effects which appeal to my tastes, not how many pixels it has.

[guzman]

@Kroganwrex: Whoa relax there, you're getting rage froth everywhere.

[MegaMohsi]

http://www.computerandvideo...

He basically states the PS3 is the lead platform but the way he was speaking in the article, I think both games will have similar resolutions and AA, PS3 might use the Quincrux AA like other Capcom games

[sayonara89]

It's not a Capcom game...

[milohighclub]

ahhh i remember reading that,so their basically saying that they dont have experience using ps3. yeah they could do it on xbox because they have exp. with the 360, but if they got the most out of the ps3 then they wouldn't be able to do it on the 360

[KratosGirI]

The game is gonna kick ass regardless of whatever resolution difference it is.

Play the game, not the graphics or resolutions.

Only graphic whores and fanboys care about this shit!

[Unicron]

Pretty pathetic this article has more hits than the actual gameplay article not 2 posts below it.

[testerg35]

Is there an exact resolution for 720p and 1080p? I thought 1280x720 is 720p and I understand calling the 360 version subHD. I thought 1080p is 1920x1080, but GT5 is 1280x1080 so that's not true 1080p?

[Sarcasm]

Yes 720p is 1280x720 and 1080p is 1920x1080

Yes GT5 is 1280x1080 thus is not true 1080p but still has 1,382,400 pixels which is 44% more pixels than 720p.

[midgard229]

meh, 360 has sub hd games and ps3 used to get sub hd games, guess it 360's tturn to get burned, tho these games actually count (ff13 and vanquish)

[XabiTheHumble]

This is more proof why multiplats aren't an accurate measure of what a console can do, its basically going by a flip of a coin now for which version is better. When will xbots learn this?

[xg-ei8ht]

Just got the PS3 version. It's

2560x1600 @ 60fps full motion blur, x8aa with move headtracking, full force rumble. 2d.

3d version only runs in 1920x1080.

\s

It's not up yet:)

[smashman98]

Who disagreed with him he was joking... and unlike most people on this site... IT WAS FUNNY

[rwest78]

It's 720p, as in 720 horizontal lines. I must've missed the memo where we started using vertical resolution.

How can 1024x768 be HD, you ask. The answer is, the Consumer Electronics Association has decided that any display with at least 720 lines can be called an HDTV and have the logo. There is some basis in fact for this because the human eye is more sensitive to vertical resolution than to horizontal resolution. This has been taken advantage of for years in NTSC because the horizontal resolution of NTSC is really poor. It is also taken advantage of in so-called HD-lite where the video is resampled to 1440x1080 on things like satellite, or maybe even shot with a 1440x1080 camera instead of the 1920x1080 camera you thought the network was using, and you probably didn't even notice.

[damnyouretall]

i own both machines, and i want this game. see, i can buy the best version and never ever ever have to bitch. feels good not to be a fanboy

[milohighclub]

you just bitched...

[MR LOOKINGBILL]

This just in ps3 version sub hd 960x568 lol.....just kiddin there is no blur on the 360 version at all. remember folks 720 is considered hd standard resolution.

[tudors]

are moaning when the game looks this good.

[tudors]

.

[tudors]

very similar.

[rjgbyrne]

This should be better when its in its final build. Looks like it might be a cool game but then again, after the Xbox Live hike I am hoping the PS3 version is better.

[Def Warrant]

LOL the 360 is really a wreak. Price hikes to inferior multiplats and lank of exclusives.

I'm not trolling but if i was given a 360 for free? i'd sell that and get me a ps3. Now that's real talk.

[awiseman]

this is something new bc almost all all multiplats are superior on the 360 and there is no lack of exclusives

[asyouburn]

look at mass effect on pc, or ANY multi on pc for that matter. 360 is clearly inferior

[hoops]

The Xbox360 AND the PS3 are weak...when these consoles can barely run its games in full 720p(that's sad also) and above 30fps....these consoles are weak. They barely perform real Anti-Alaising. They cannot perfrom HDR at above 24FP (somethign the 9700pro was capable of doing...find out how old that GPU is)
And textures for all games come in a variety of low and high resolution textures. Now that's sad....That's next generation???
That's weak for both the PS3 and XBOX360

[awiseman]

The editor says that the 360 version plays at sub-hd and only has 2x AA
THEN goes onto mention that the ps3 version is released on psn later today.

What connection do these two statements have? Of course the sony fanboys jumb all over the article and thumb down anybody who says that 1024x720 isnt all that bad. Il probably get thumbs down to because its the truth, this whole site is run by sony fanboys.

BTW if what this article says is true then its a rarity bc 90% of multiplats play and look better on the 360 bacause its easier to set the xbox as the base platform. Like it or not its the truth.

[MR LOOKINGBILL]

I totally agree. Your typical ps3 fanboys alwas have to show there ignorance and neanderthal behavior. This shows you the kind of sickness they have while RDR has sub hd resolution far below Vanquish yet they are praising the game.

[Ichiryoka]

http://forums.gametrailers....

[Keltik82]

Action going on! This game looks sick as hell!

[asgharagha]

i think xbox will become a sub-hd console in next months and there will be a few hd games on xbox .
mafia 2 .kane and linch 2 vanquish alan wake ff 13 star ocean call of dutys splinter and........its really disaponitingggggggggggg

[MR LOOKINGBILL]

you must have typed your comment out your ass. Mafia 2 looks sub HD on the ps3 and missing a ton of detail and textures. Do your research before making ignorant comments.

[asgharagha]

im agree with u ps3 has sub hd games too but at least it has some graphical giants like killzone 2 and uncharted 2 and god of war 3 and heavy rain and...so ps3 really satisfies its owners with really beautiful hd games but it seems xbox cant give us games more beautiful than mass effect 2

[hot4play]

Downloaded and played the PS3 demo a while ago...
It was super fun...and fast! It's like Uncharted, meets Devil May Cry, meets Halo. :p
Cheesy in a good way!

I don't know the technicals behind the graphics/resolution but the game looks a bit less sharp than Uncharted and some jaggies can be seen. BUT to me it didn't affect my enjoyment of the game. It still looks good (art direction), and it runs fast. I did notice that the cutscenes looked sharper and more detailed...

[hoops]

Is this not sad when the biggest pressing news for console game releases this generation is:

"is it running in full HD?????"

And that means 720p and NOT 1080P....how sad. The PS3 and Xbox360 can barely do 720p with real AA sampled only 2 times...LETS NOT EVEN MENTION 60FPS AT THAT RESOLUTION...and Microsoft and Sony call their systems: NEXT GENERATION?????

How standards have dropped.

[SephireX]

Who cares. There are so many enemies on screen at once with so much action that it is understandable. This game will be awesome regardless. I hope the PS3 version is 720p. Pretty damn impressive if it is. Then again, this is only the demo so the final game might be in Hd.

[OSU_Gamer]

720 is sub-hd?

[bobdog626]

Get your Facts Right.Its not Full HD like 1080p but it is in High Def though.

[hassi94]

720 by 1024 is not 720p though...

[Shane Kim]

Doesnt 1024x720 mean 720p? or am I lost here? If that's the case...the game is NOT sub-HD.

[hassi94]

720p is 720 by 1280, so the advertised resolution is a little lower, not as low as say 560p and 600p that you get with most multiplats though.

[SuperSaiyan4]

It's 1280x720 that is 720p...Go check google.

[Megaman42xX]

The site doesn't actually compare screenshots. It just posts a few images and calls it a comparison. It says "looks like the 360 demo is 1024x720 2xAA," nothing about the ps3 version.

http://n4g.com/news/595721/...

The hypocrisy is also at its peak here. An earlier "story" that was just a forum post was shut down for being a forum post. If you're trashing one form of the game, chances are you never were going to buy that one anyway. You're just seeking affirmation that yours is better, if you really needed that you're pathetic.

[djfullshred]

You have to let your eyes judge whether a game looks good, and not some resolution chart tell you. We are not talking photography here, we are talking about computer animation. You can have very clear animated images at 720P.

[hassi94]

Remember that they sometimes lower resolutions for demos to make file size smaller and hide some blemishes that are not yet ironed out. Maybe not though, not really sure if I'm interested in this game tbh, I'll try out the demo and see.

[Garrus_Vakarian]

It's still a fun game regardless.

[SuperSaiyan4]

The person that posted that has just owned themselves, that resolution IS HD resolution it is 720p.

[ReBurn]

Oh, man. There's no way that this game could be any fun, right? I mean at that resolution there's absolutely no way that a person could have any fun playing the game.

Why do we still argue over stuff like this?

[btk]

Looks good enough. Who cares about 10 pixels less. It is not asif it is 320x240 with 16 colors.

[Lightel0s]

honestly.... who cares? i got a standard television, so theres no way for me to play in HD xD

[ChickeyCantor]

O the horrors...*facepalm*

[finbars75]

I dont care what the game looks like personally.The game from what I have played from the demo so far sucks ass.It felt like I was playing a hyper speed gears of war and the character reminds me deadspace character.But over all its was a crappy experience period.Thought this game might have its own style but nope same old same old.