360°

Microsoft Took "Shortcuts" with Kinect

The creator of little-known motion detection technology iisu reckons Microsoft took "shortcuts" to get Xbox 360 add-on Kinect to market this November.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
movements4988d ago (Edited 4988d ago )

Not good.

MS should take its time to provide customers with a product that functions properly, and not just some quick put together to make casual money.

Remember the Xbox 360 and RROD. I tell ya, MS just won't learn.

Fan Tastic4988d ago Show
brazilianbumpincher4988d ago (Edited 4988d ago )

that regardless of corners cut by microsoft they launch before his tech..

iFLOWLIKEWATER4988d ago

o in other words, I should wait and buy this guy's camera because he "talked it up"? I think I'll wait and let MS buy his company and then everyone is a happy camper. Whose with me? Lol...

HSx94988d ago

I wouldn't be surprised if they took "shortcuts" with the xbox 360 as well.

Millah4988d ago (Edited 4988d ago )

Its no surprise MS is taking shortcuts. They never seem to learn from their past mistakes. Its really quite unbelievable how stupid they are.

Same old Microsoft, just a different era.

HOWEVER, this guys statements need to be taken with a grain of salt, because he's just a smaller unknown competitor trying to sell his own product, and will try to make the big guys product look inferior if he can. I'm NOT saying he's wrong, because its very apparent that MS rushed Kinect and cut corners to get it to market. I'm just saying this guy has his own agenda, and that doesn't include making Kinect look good.

TotalPS3Fanboy4987d ago

Too bad 360 gamers will never learn too.

webeblazing4987d ago

why should they learn if people dont care. ask a wife beater would he learn if his wife still wont leave him. thats a small chance.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4987d ago
Dance4988d ago

its up to the developer to find ways around the it

hoops4988d ago

Yes and no. Great devs will find a way, however if this article rings true, it's MS fault for releasing yet again half backed hardware to make it to the market faster.
From a business standpoint it makes sense as Kinect will appeal mostly to the non gaming crown that would care less of graphics...accuracy etc...they just want trendy Wii like party fun games.
So this might pay off for MS to release it early and then correct it later on. Gee that sounds familiar.....

Pennywise4988d ago

I am making a list, Dance:

Cool:
Devs having to find ways around a console and peripherals weaknesses.

Not Cool:
Devs having to find ways to code to consoles advantages.

Definitely not cool:
Hypocrites.

4988d ago
divideby04988d ago

totally agree MS is all about marketing and rushing an unfinished product to market.

need we recall the RROD.....
how about the HDDVD.....

and now Kinetic.

Hoje03084988d ago

In their defense, the HD format war could have gone either way. The RROD on the other hand, well that just shows that they're assholes.

Misterhbk4988d ago

Not good at all.
Thousands of people are about to get screwed over by microsoft again, come this holiday season. Im sure this will still go the way of the 360 and people will simply repurchase instead of waiting til the product is actually fixed.
For the consumers that will purchase this, I feel bad, because many of the casual gamers will have no idea what theyre really getting into. Something MS seems to be banking on with Kinect.

Hoolock4988d ago

This article is a little shadey. Its hard to take the opinion of of a person who is working for a competing technology. He's hardly going to sing the technical praises of Kinect when he himself is trying to launch a competing product that has zero limelight. He could be completely honest in his remarks or he may just be trying to promote his product over Microsoft's. I'd go with the later.

brazilianbumpincher4988d ago

his right in some aspects,natal had a cpu kinect hasnt and i think thats where most of the lag comes from,but yeh like i said in my earlier post he does sound bitter

outrageous4988d ago

Well said...he may be telling the truth but comparing his small company to M$ is like comparing ants to elephants.

Things are changing daily for Kinect with more and more imput from M$ and developers everywhere. He claims that he could do everything he claims with Kinect as is...Hmmm... what makes anyone think that M$ can't do the same. Kinect is in it's infancy...doesn't even release till November.

The problem with this guys tech is it's patented which is good for him BUT Sony or M$ paying royalties on a device that could potentially sell millions is not really the best incentive for these guys. Look a M$ hooking up with AMD/ati...all about the royalties

Robearboy4988d ago (Edited 4988d ago )

Yawn another anti MS article - I personally think that a company that probably has more employees than the entire population of Belguim maybe a little more equiped to work on the technology a bit quicker than the small firm who spent years on it.
And like so many people keep on saying, the tech was half cooked anyway before MS got their hands on it so its not like that were starting off with the eggs, flour and sugar, all they needed to do was put the icing and candles on it

rwarner1744988d ago

You could throw 5 million janitors at a problem, but I doubt they will solve it faster than one electricical/computer engineer when it comes to computer hardware. Janitors and software engineers almost have the same real world skill set actually. Actually, at least janitors know how to clean.

-Ikon-4988d ago

This is why I dont buy MS products.

writersblock4988d ago

Its that people wont learn that taking shortcuts is what MS does. MS doesnt need to learn since people keep buying their stuff, PEOPLE need to learn to stop buying crappy products

bustamove4988d ago

Shortcuts is what gave the 360 the RROD in the first place. Microsoft needs to stop taking shortcuts before it costs them in the end.

bjornbear4988d ago (Edited 4988d ago )

now thats not news.

@ people doubting source:

sure, its shady but what did you expect? a Kinect dev or MS dev to say this? get real.

all you need is a little common sense and some eyes to see that kinect hasn't been very impressive (thus far)

however, like with everything, we must wait and see until it comes out.

harrisk9544988d ago

Great quote from the article:

"I'm not impressed with the technical result. But I'm impressed by the marketing efforts."

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4987d ago
divideby04988d ago

"I'm not impressed with the technical result. But I'm impressed by the marketing efforts."

that about just sums it all up... its all about glitter, smoke in mirrors and not substance...

my decision of not buying one continues to be justified to me

divideby04988d ago (Edited 4988d ago )

LOL at the DAs...clearly you didnt read the article or just didnt understand it?

I quoted one of the original Natal developers...disagree with someone like him... just LMAO.....

KiLLUMiNATi_894988d ago ShowReplies(5)
lelo2play4988d ago (Edited 4988d ago )

It would be better to delay Kinect for some time and make it work, then release a broken product in November. It might sell well in the beginning, but after some time people will realize it does not work. Stupid... stupid... Microsoft. There has been a lot of negative articles towards Kinect, and i bet a lot of people are starting to have 2nd thoughts of buying Kinect... but i guess we have to wait till November to see if it works or not.

HeroXIV4988d ago

I feel a bit sorry for the kids who ask their parents for this, or for the people who think it'll help them lose weight.

Newsflash to those people : sports in the REAL world are infinitely better than they are in the virtual one.

Show all comments (76)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia819d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog819d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry916819d ago (Edited 819d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

819d ago
CrimsonWing69819d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming818d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer79818d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember818d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog819d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop819d ago (Edited 819d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog819d ago (Edited 819d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop818d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic818d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop818d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic817d ago (Edited 817d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 817d ago
Aloymetal818d ago (Edited 818d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic818d ago (Edited 818d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf10819d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar819d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf10819d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell819d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf10818d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv72818d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming819d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog819d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming818d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming819d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv72995d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister995d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

995d ago Replies(2)
Godmars290995d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch995d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister995d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 995d ago
TheEnigma313995d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister995d ago (Edited 995d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch995d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss995d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister995d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat77995d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister995d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars290995d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss995d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars290995d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin995d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)