Here is a video comparison of Tomb Raider on the PS1, compared to the Anniversary edition to be released on the PS2.
We've gone on many adventures with Lara Croft. With another reboot in the making, Wealth of Geeks felt it was a good time to go down the nostalgia rabbit hole and remember the best of those tomb-raiding thrills.
I do agree that Tomb Raider Angel of Darkness was the worse one 😂 I remember playing some of it and I took it back. That game was just awful in every way. I bought it used at gamestop and glad they had that 7 day return policy for used games 😂
Simple. He's been hating on the Tomb Raider reboots for years. I can't imagine seeing them at the top of a best TR game list let alone being on the list in general sitting well with him because of it.
Zeek
“Hating”
No no, just pointing out how TR mutated into a generic action adventure game losing the appeal of what it once was when it was more about puzzles and platforming over going Rambo, slaughtering waves of enemies
But hey, continue being a dick and speaking about me like I’m not going to see the comment.
Foxtrot, I'm curious if you have played the most recent games. Sure the 2013 reboot was hugely focused on combat, but each follow up became less and less about combat to the point where outside of a few large scale story missions I don't even remember combat being a part of shadow of the tomb raider. Shadow was so puzzle focused it actually was a bit much for me and I love the TR puzzles.
I still feel like Rise was the best of the series and I was a huge fan of the originals. To me it struck the perfect balance of exploration, platforming, puzzles, and combat. Not saying your opinion is wrong I'm just curious what you think they should have done different. Games do need to evolve somewhat to stay relevant. Would you prefer small linear jumping platform levels like the original?
I think Shadow wasn't even develop by crystal dynamics. I thought it was the worse in the new trilogy
That's right. Shadow was developed by Eidos Montreal who who went and made Marvels Guardians of the Galaxy next. (Great game)
Meanwhile after Rise of the Tomb Raider, Crystal Dynamics made Marvels Avengers. (bad game)
For me, Legend should be alot higher (along with the other two ). Shadow, I enjoyed it, but has too much has fluff, as modern games tend to do. Playing the remastered series, and apart from the controls, is very good.
I really enjoyed the first 2 games, Legend and the first of the reboots and the rest I didn’t get into so I never finished.
Completely subjective list. I really liked Underworld, I preferred Lara's design. That said I loved the horror/uncharted feel of the reboot. I think all the TR games have strengths and weaknesses. None are objectively better in every way.
The Tomb Raider Collection is on sale for $50.50 as part of the Humble Store’s Tomb Raider Week. The collection normally retails for over $200.
The Tomb Raider Collection includes every Tomb Raider game ever released for PC prior to Shadow of the Tomb Raider, including the award-winning Rise of the Tomb Raider and the top-down shooter Lara Croft and the Temple of Osiris.
Two of Lara Croft's Xbox 360 adventures, Tomb Raider Legend and Tomb Raider Anniversary, are now playable on Xbox One.
New games are always welcome but still waiting, for reasons unknown, on the Microsoft published Ninja Gaiden 2.
The consent of IP holders appears to be needed for Microsoft to make games backwards compatible.
That could be. There was a Major Nelson post a while back in which he stated if you want games to be BC you need to contact and ask the publisher. Unfortunately I can't find any contact information for Microsoft Studios in able to request NG2. First NG is BC so I'm not sure what the problem is, then again maybe it is coming.
That is up to Tecmo, not MS? There must be some licensing issue.
And for those bringing up NGBlack, well, again, Tecmo had to approve that, not MS. Other than a dev just not wanting to make their games available it is usually a license issue keeping games off of BC, not MS.
I would rather they released 4K patches for Unpatched Xbox One games rather than last gen games
MS is the one to ask for BC, The reworking of code for 4k patches is done by the actual devs...
Try begging your fave devs to do this, as MS has little to do with the 4k Patches for Current gen games.
Hence, why Battlefield 1's patch took so damn long.
It seems they can do both. I am fine with what they are doing as I play more OG Xbox and 360 games than I do this gen games.
still no dantes inferno or ninja gaiden 2???????
I'm starting to get impatient
https://www.eurogamer.net/a...
I think Dante's Inferno is already BC...but as for Ninja Gaiden 2 well...
Tell me a emulator that will play those as good as my Xbox One X.... I will wait.... and wait....
Usually, I hate these comparison videos and would never approve one, because they are designed to cause flame arguments and to try and demean a console.
This however shows just how much of a leap the PS2 was from it's predecessor. It's hard to remember playing the PS1 and thinking how amazing the graphics looked, especially when shown like this. This game could have been a big c**k-up, but having played the demo, they made a fantastic job of it, and it is a great tribute to an amazing genre-defining game.
Kudos to Crystal Dynamics.
Great, so the breasteses aren't as pointy. Did the video really need to highlight that point three different times?
We don't need a Lara rehash, or a version for every machine, including my toaster. We need a true next-gen Lara with a great developer. (Legends was OK, but not great.)