240°

Blizzard Shuns Original StarCraft Voice Actors

StarcraftWire and BlizzPlanet, two Blizzard and StarCraft fansites, have followed the development on which artists will be featuring in StarCraft II, and after much ado, it's now confirmed that neither Glynnis Talken or Robert Clotworthy will be voicing the famous Kerrigan, Queen of Blades and Jim Raynor. Many fans are upset, and when Blizzard were still auditioning, community members where trying to petition Blizzard into keeping the original actors.

Read Full Story >>
starcraftwire.net
Cogo5536d ago

Yep, it's a short way of saying it :(

Tempist5536d ago

*sigh*

Did they ask too much to do the rolls? There is absolutely no reason for this, but reason enough no to bother with a game that's taken nearly a decade (or is it more) to be released.

A shame and an upset Blizzard.

SCFreelancer5536d ago

I am sorry to see them go. If this is going to be a good choice or not depends on what we get in return.

FarEastOrient5535d ago

Yeah that's just like Snake not being voiced by David Hayter.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5535d ago
AndyA5536d ago

No way! Some of the community will be up in arms.

Leord5536d ago

Well, lots of people are discontented, but none are really up in arms, which is sad. The thing is, the previously mentioned petition could have had a lot better response over all, and it didn't, even if lots of members did join in the discussions JUST for that reason, it was apparently not enough.

IT needs to be something "fantastic" like the colour controversy on D3 to get people riled up, and even then you only get the twats!

Maticus5536d ago

Yup, they are already. Blizzard fans are a bad lot to p*ss off :(

Cogo5536d ago

I'm actually pretty convinced nothing will happen. People don't realize what they have or haven't done until it's too late. At this stage it's definitely too late to complain, as teh actors are set, and they are NOT the originals :(

Leord5536d ago

@ Cogo

You are probably right, and it makes me sad =(

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5536d ago
Maticus5536d ago

That's actually very bad news. I can't imagine why Blizzard would do this, maybe the actors didn't want to return, but I can't see why.

Leord5536d ago

Metzen talked about this. He wanted someone "better" even for SC1, but they did not have the cash,so they will get one now. However, I do think that coherence is better than the single creative vision years past. I mean it's more ingrained in the fans now than anything. There is no need to remove the voices we recognize!

Cogo5536d ago

The article even said the actors wanted to return...

Fyzzu5536d ago

Bah, shame. Oh well. From memory it's not like Arthas has remained consistent; I'm sure they'll find fitting voice actors.

Cogo5536d ago

It has indeed been consistent since Warcraft 3. I suppose Metzen got his fav voice back then, as they had more cash, and since that time, they just found it good to hire him again. I think what they miss on is that people STILL play SC1. It's not like we forgot the voices, and they were so ingrained in our heads anyway from prolonged playing, so this whole thing is silly.

thetamer5536d ago

Well, I don't blame Blizzard. If these actors are old and having cracking and croaky voices, it might not sit well with the game. And let's face it, who wants senile actors that can't remember lines? Not me, that's for sure.

Maticus5536d ago

They're not old lol, the voices have become almost cult-like now. They should've kept them.

SCFreelancer5536d ago

@Maticus: I agree that it would have been nice when looking at their cult status. But don't forget that we don't know anything about their replacements thusfar. They might actually be better ;)

Show all comments (27)
90°

It Seems Pretty Clear Why StarCraft 3 is Not a Thing Yet

Even though fans have been clamoring for a StarCraft 3 for years now, it seems like Blizzard really has no reason to spend time making one.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
StormSnooper158d ago

They sort of ran the story as far as it could go.

Also, it seems like blizzard is more busy with mediocrity at this point in time.

Jingsing158d ago

The problem with Blizzard is they have franchises that don't need sequels. People are happy playing the games that they previously made. What they need is new games, none of this business of trying to transport the old audience into a new version of an old game which only ends up nickle and dime'ing users.

170°

$15 horse for WoW made more money than StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty

Jason Hall, currently an indie developer and former Blizzard employee, has been sharing some really interesting stories from his long career in the industry for a while now. Some of them are truly insightful, while others may seem depressing.

Read Full Story >>
gameworldobserver.com
Sciurus_vulgaris160d ago

I’m a little shocked that StarCraft 2: Wings of Liberty sold only around 6 million copies. The original StarCraft did over 11 million. Maybe Blizzard was too leisurely in releasing StarCraft 2? Starcraft 2 came out 12 years after it’s predecessor.

Plague-Doctor27159d ago (Edited 159d ago )

Im surprised too. Starcraft was still a huge name in 2010. It was kinda the only new RTS around and other genres like MOBAs hadn't really kicked off yet. I do remember at the time sentiment around the game was
pretty angry the game was being split into 3 but I doubt that would have impacted sales to that degree

Sciurus_vulgaris159d ago

For a long time I believed StarCraft II sold on par or better than its predecessor. There was so much hype for the game. Plus it had a pretty strong E-Sports scene for a few years.

Myself and half a dozen friends all bought StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty and played it religiously for a full year. While I bought the expansions, most of my friends did not. RPGs seem to be a generally low selling genre.

Nerdmaster159d ago

I'm not shocked at all. This was an early example of Blizzard being greedy. Instead of releasing a complete experience, splitting Starcraft 2 in 3 parts so it could make us purchase it 3 times if we wanted to know the whole story and play story mode with the other races.

Sciurus_vulgaris159d ago

I originally had that stance. However, Wings of Liberty, was just as long, if not longer than StarCraft 1. The expansions were of decent length too and added a good amount of additional content.

il-JumperMT159d ago

and people wonder why we are having mtx in everything. i blame the people who actual buy them.

Nerdmaster159d ago

It's interesting he used Brazil as an example of the importance of regional pricing. Nowadays many companies on Steam are setting their prices in Brazil as high as, if not more than, their price in USA. I simply refused to buy a few games when I noticed that's the case.

Extermin8or3_159d ago

This right here is the fucking problem.

159d ago
70°

Star Discord is a StarCraft lookalike optimised for mobile by a one-man team, out now

Illogical Games has just announced the official release of Star Discord, the one-man indie dev's charming StarCraft lookalike on mobile.

Read Full Story >>
pocketgamer.com
XiNatsuDragnel829d ago

I wish for a console version too